Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Construction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Muhlenberg County board approves termination of architect agreement for Longest Elementary, will advertise new RFP

5374372 · July 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Muhlenberg County School Board voted to terminate its agreement with the architect on the Longest Elementary early childhood renovation and agreed to advertise a request for proposals for new architectural or engineering services; projects already under construction will remain with the current firm, board members said.

Chairman Reager called the Muhlenberg County School Board meeting to order and introduced item a, asking the board to consider termination of the agreement with the architect on the Longest Elementary early childhood renovation and district facilities planning process. "At this time, we'll go over item, a, which is to consider termination of agreement with architect on Longest Elementary early childhood renovation and district facilities planning process," Chairman Reager said.

Board Member Johar moved to terminate the agreement; Board Member Bard seconded the motion. The board approved the motion by voice vote. Chairman Reager then introduced item b, asking the board to authorize advertising a request for proposals for architectural or engineering services to replace the terminated agreement. "With the termination of the above agreement, we'll need to, advertise for, new proposals for the project," Chairman Reager said. A motion to advertise the RFP was moved and seconded and approved by voice vote.

During discussion, Board Member Bard clarified that projects already under construction will remain with the current architectural firm, which the board identified as Summit, because another firm would not assume liability for work already underway. "The ones that we already have under construction ... those have to stay with Summit because they're already under construction and another, architect firm would not be willing to take on that liability. So those will stay with Summit," Bard said. The board said the advertising action applies to the new projects tied to the terminated agreement, not to in-progress construction.

The board did not record a roll-call vote in the transcript; the actions were taken by voice vote and recorded as approved. The board did not provide further schedule or procurement details during the recorded discussion.

The board moved on after approving the RFP advertisement; no other conditions or amendments were recorded on the termination or the advertising motion.