Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roads And Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts revised local‑street alternatives and stronger pavement standard; staff to return with pedestrian‑surface specification
Summary
The Hideout Town Council on July 10 approved changes to the town’s engineering standards that create a limited alternative local‑street cross‑section, tighten pavement minimums and allow sidewalk elimination on narrowly defined dead‑end streets.
Hideout’s council amended the town’s engineering standards and drawings on July 10 to give staff and developers an alternative local‑street cross‑section for limited circumstances and to strengthen pavement thickness requirements.
Gordon, the town’s engineering consultant, explained that the proposed alternatives are intended for streets where technical need for on‑street parking or sidewalks is demonstrably absent. Under the amendments, curb‑to‑curb widths can be narrowed if: residences do not front both sides of a block, parking can be provided on the opposite side where the developer controls both sides, and there is no actual or planned pedestrian destination such as commercial development or a trailhead. Dead‑end streets with fewer than a specified number of residences and limited potential pedestrian demand may qualify for sidewalk elimination if town engineers determine public utility easements (PUEs) can be finished and used for snow storage and safe pedestrian access.
Council members pressed for objective criteria and asked that the draft replace the term “potential destination” with the clearer phrase “actual or planned destination”; the council adopted that wording change during the meeting. Gordon also explained the pavement changes: the standard structural section for local streets was increased to 4 inches of asphalt over 8 inches of road base (the previous local minimum had been 3 inches over 8 inches), and the manual included a 15% maximum content for reclaimed asphalt pavement in mixes. The council said the thicker pavement reflects construction traffic and long‑term durability.
Councilmembers approved the standards package with an instruction to staff: provide a technical specification for the pedestrian surface proposed for the PUE (compacted road base or similar finish) and return with that spec at the next meeting. Councilmember Thomas asked that the specification be compatible with local aesthetics and allow typical compacted finishes used in Hideout Canyon (crushed granite or road base), and Gordon agreed to work with staff to produce a formal material spec for council review.
Ending: The engineering standards and drawings were approved (with the wording change replacing “potential” with “actual or planned” for pedestrian destinations). Staff will return with a finalized material specification for the PUE pedestrian surface and confirm the minor numerical corrections to the drawings at the next meeting.
