Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fauquier supervisors review tougher noise rules: daytime dBA limits, county enforcement and injunction option proposed
Summary
At a July 10 work session the Fauquier County Board of Supervisors reviewed proposed changes to Chapter 13.5 that add daytime decibel thresholds, expand enforcement options to the county and create an injunction remedy for repeat offenders. Sheriffs staff urged training and a public-education period before implementation.
Fauquier County supervisors reviewed proposed revisions to Chapter 13.5 of the county code during a July 10 work session that would add daytime noise standards, specify decibel thresholds and broaden enforcement options.
The draft ordinance would set a daytime threshold of 65 dBA for residential settings and a nighttime threshold of 55 dBA, allow officers to issue summonses when noise is "plainly audible" inside a dwelling with doors and windows closed, and permit the county to seek injunctive relief against property owners who repeatedly violate the code. Penalties referenced in the draft follow state guidance cited in the staff presentation: a $250 civil penalty for a first offense and $500 for a second offense.
County staff said the changes aim to give deputies clearer metrics for enforcement and to address chronic or commercial sources of noise that the current code does not adequately deter. "We've added enforcement mechanisms so the county can address repeated, substantive noise issues rather than relying solely on a series of individual summonses," the presenter said during the session.
Sheriff Falls and his command staff told supervisors the proposed measures would increase enforceable options, but they warned of operational limits. Falls said vehicle-noise enforcement would be particularly difficult in practice because deputies must be able to identify and stop a specific vehicle to document equipment violations. He also said daytime enforcement could expand call volume and requires clear guidance so deputies do not face conflicting standards in the field.
Supervisors and staff discussed exemptions and special cases. Existing statutory exemptions, such as for agricultural activities, railroads, and emergency operations, remain in the draft; staff proposed tightening the agricultural exemption language to apply to "active" agricultural operations (active crops, livestock or livestock products) rather than any property with an agricultural designation. The draft also clarifies where officers should stand when using decibel meters and directs that enforcement may rely either on a dBA reading or on a plainly audible test inside a dwelling.
Sheriff Falls and county staff requested a short implementation period for training and public outreach. Falls said the sheriffs office already owns decibel meters and could be ready to enforce the ordinance after training; supervisors discussed a target effective date about 30 days after adoption to allow for community education and deputy training.
The board did not vote on the ordinance at the work session; staff said the item will return for further discussion (and will be part of a formal public hearing process if the board decides to proceed).
