Olentangy approves design-only amendment with Fanning Howie to prepare plans for possible fifth high school

5354454 · July 10, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board approved a third amendment with Fanning Howie & Associates to secure schematic and construction-document design services now (design only), locking fees while deferring any construction commitment until the board decides to proceed.

At the July 9 meeting, district staff presented and the board approved an amendment to the existing contract with architecture firm Fanning Howie and Associates to provide schematic design through construction-document services for a potential fifth high school.

District staff member Mister Gordon told the board the amendment being approved that night covered only design services; construction would require a future, separate amendment. He said the district sought to lock in design fees now to protect against future construction-price escalation while keeping the district uncommitted to build until it completes other approvals.

According to the memo distributed with the agenda, the district negotiated a fee structure that applies a historically negotiated 4.5% fee to a reduced construction-cost base; that approach yielded an approximately $583,000 reduction relative to applying the 4.5% fee to the full construction estimate. Gordon said the replication of previous high-school designs has historically saved the district “in excess of $3,000,000” and may have been closer to $6,000,000 on some materials presented during levy planning.

Board members asked whether the district could change design or construction firms between the design phase and any later construction contract; staff said the district retains the option to engage a different manager or contractor once design documents are complete, though building-code updates could be required if the project is delayed.

The board approved the amendment as part of the superintendent consent items. The item was presented as a cost-saving, preparatory step tied to a previously passed resolution of necessity that would allow the district to place a bond issue on the ballot in the future if it chooses.