Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Immigration Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South Gate council adopts resolution opposing recent immigration enforcement; directs staff to explore legal options
Summary
After more than an hour of public comment, the South Gate City Council approved a resolution condemning recent immigration enforcement activity in the region and asked city attorneys and managers to explore joining federal litigation and to provide community support measures.
The South Gate City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to adopt a resolution opposing recent immigration enforcement tactics and to direct staff to explore legal and programmatic steps to protect residents.
The resolution, approved as part of the consent calendar after extensive public comment, says the city condemns what speakers described as “unlawful immigration enforcement tactics” and calls for steps to protect residents, document incidents, and coordinate with regional partners. The council recorded a roll-call vote of yes by all members present.
The vote followed more than two hours of public comment from residents, community organizers and service providers who urged the council to go beyond a symbolic measure. Julie Morales, identifying herself as a lifelong South Gate resident and homeowner, said the resolution “sends a message that our city values the dignity, the rights, and the safety of immigrant families” but urged officials not to stop at words. Christian, a Downey resident who said most of his extended family lives in South Gate, recounted an arrest in which a relative was taken from a courthouse parking lot and moved hundreds of miles; “now his son has to grow up without his father,” he said.
Speakers asked for an ordinance with enforceable protections similar to the one passed June 11 by the Huntington Park City Council, a city attorney said. Residents and service providers requested concrete follow-up: a hotline or relief fund for people who lose income because of enforcement actions, “know your rights” outreach, and clearer local procedures to verify the identity and authority of persons claiming to be federal agents.
Council members and staff emphasized limits to municipal authority while committing to several next steps. City Attorney Salinas noted state law already restricts local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement (citing the California Values Act) and described a pending multi‑plaintiff federal lawsuit — brought by groups including the United Farm Workers and the ACLU — that challenges certain federal immigration tactics. The council asked staff to monitor that litigation and to explore whether South Gate and neighboring Southeast Los Angeles cities should seek to join or otherwise support the case.
Council members also described ongoing operational support already in place: weekly food deliveries organized by nonprofits and volunteers, and offers by staff and parks personnel to help with distribution. Several council members said they had been coordinating with community groups to create contact lists and safe channels for requests for assistance.
Mayor Maria Davila thanked residents for speaking and urged continued coordination between the city and local nonprofits. The council recorded a unanimous vote to adopt the resolution and to direct the city manager and city attorney to evaluate legal options, to consider outreach and relief measures, and to improve communication about how and when residents can seek help.
The resolution itself does not create a new ordinance or new funding; council members instructed staff to return with options that would be consistent with state and federal law and with details about implementation and any fiscal impacts.
