Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Amendment Towers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission adopts tower setback rule and updates planning commission bylaws
Summary
Linn County amended its zoning code to require conditional use permits for communication towers of 100 feet or taller on agricultural land and set a 110%‑of‑height setback from property lines, and also revised planning commission bylaws on membership, terms and meeting packet timing.
The Linn County Planning Commission approved amendments to the county zoning regulations that clarify how communication towers are handled on agricultural land and also revised internal planning commission bylaws governing membership, terms and meeting procedures.
Under the adopted regulatory amendment, any radio, cellular, television broadcasting or similar tower 100 feet in height or taller on agricultural land will require a conditional use permit and must be sited so that the nearest property line is at least 110 percent of the tower’s height away from the tower base (for example, a 200‑foot tower must be sited at least 220 feet from property lines). The change replaces a prior ambiguous threshold and specifies the setback standard the commission will apply when reviewing tower proposals in agricultural zones.
Commissioners also voted to amend the planning commission’s bylaws. Changes include setting the commission membership at nine members (three from each county commission district), instituting three‑year terms with a two‑term limit, permitting virtual attendance consistent with county policy, and requiring that agenda packets and accompanying staff reports for new business be made available to commissioners via the county file server or email at least three working days before a meeting. The bylaws revisions also included clarifications on quorum, meeting administration and an instruction that members who miss more than half of regular meetings in a calendar year may be recommended to the county commission for replacement.
Peoples Telecommunications representative Jennifer (last name on record) said public notice requirements for the CUP application associated with a proposed Peoples tower had been published and discussed in prior notices; she asked the commission to confirm procedural timelines. County counsel and staff confirmed state notice requirements for zoning amendments and said the amendment process met the legal notice standard (20‑day publication) and that an amendment can be advanced without the same 14‑day delay that applies to a CUP. Darren Wilson, speaking on procedural law, clarified notice and timing for zoning amendments.
A public commenter, Skye Ferris of Tanglewood, voiced opposition to taller towers generally and said neighbors were concerned about new tower permitting. The commission stated the amendment creates a predictable review process and clarified that towers shorter than 100 feet in agricultural zones remain a permitted use under the county code and would not need a conditional use permit.
The motion to adopt the regulatory amendment and the bylaw updates passed by voice vote. Staff said the amendment will be forwarded to the county commission for ratification as required by county ordinance and state statute.
