Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council hears budget-window estimate ahead of water park proposal presentation

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Councilmembers said Paddock will present a budget range for a proposed water park; members discussed preference for a more ambitious option, permitting and geotechnical issues, and a 50-day charter wait for contract action.

Councilmembers discussed next steps and cost expectations for a proposed water park project, saying the design-build proposer (Paddock) will provide a budget estimate before the council’s next regular meeting.

Jay, who has been overseeing project coordination, said Paddock plans to present a base-bid budget and a window of estimated costs for upgraded options. He said the proposer will aim to give the council a number before the council goes “live” with the project discussion and noted that the firm expects to present a base package first and then show optional add-ons.

Councilmember Jay said he favors a more ambitious option (referred to in discussion as option B) rather than a baseline “option A.” Members discussed previously prepared concept plans and a prior budget estimate that had been published online at about $6 million; speakers noted that the prior estimate excluded some items (for example, a bathhouse) and that additional costs and permitting could increase total costs.

Town engineering staff told the council that earlier efforts failed to attract bidders because of uncertainties about underlying piles and soil conditions. A geotechnical investigation was completed; town staff said addressing foundation and settlement throughout the fenced park area was part of the current planning. Council members emphasized they prefer to “do it right” rather than rush the project, even if that increases time and cost.

Councilmembers said Paddock will provide a scope of work along with the budget window at the next meeting to help the town evaluate whether the project is financially and practically feasible. No procurement or contract action was taken at the work session; council members noted that, per the charter, any contract action would be subject to a 50-day waiting period after a vote.