Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sentencing Parole topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Author seeks to limit most‑generous early‑release formula for offenders convicted of child abuse resulting in death
Summary
Assemblymember Hoover told the committee AB 1011 would bar the most‑generous early‑release formula (two‑thirds credit commonly associated with conservation/fire camps) for people convicted of child abuse that results in death, while preserving other rehabilitative programming.
Assemblymember Hoover presented AB 1011 to prohibit people convicted of child abuse resulting in death from earning early‑release credits under California’s most generous ‘‘two‑thirds’’ formula (commonly associated with the conservation camp program). The author said the bill is narrowly tailored to prevent defendants in such cases from receiving accelerated release via the firefighting/camp credit formula while preserving eligibility for other credits and continued access to rehabilitation programs.
A father who lost his daughter in a Sacramento County child‑abuse case told the committee the person who killed his child pleaded guilty, was sentenced and then was able to pursue early release eligibility through the conservation camp program and had served what the author described as a short time in custody before entering the program. The parent asked the committee to "do the right thing" for victims and families.
Supporters included the California State Sheriffs' Association and victim‑advocacy groups. Opponents — including Initiate Justice and the California Public Defenders Association — said the bill would remove rehabilitative opportunities available through conservation camps; public‑defender testimony stressed the value of rehabilitation programs and warned that removing eligibility undermines transformation and public‑safety goals.
Witnesses for the opposition also noted that child‑endangerment statutes cover a broad set of circumstances and that statutory drafting could unintentionally sweep in cases where the underlying conduct differs from the most egregious facts described by the author. The author and supporters countered the bill is narrowly drafted and intended to affect only the most serious child‑abuse resulting in death convictions; committee members asked technical questions about statutory cross‑references and parole procedures.
No vote was taken at the hearing; sponsors requested the committee hold the bill for future action when a quorum is present.
