Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the State Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

California Senate adopts $321.1 billion budget package; lawmakers split over reserves, program choices

5092653 · June 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The California State Senate voted to adopt a budget package including AB 102 that sets $321.1 billion in total spending for 2024–25, drawing sharp debate over process, reserves and program priorities; related trailer bills and confirmations also passed.

The California State Senate on June 27 adopted the final budget package, led by Assembly Bill 102, approving $321,100,000,000 in total spending for the fiscal year and a $228,400,000,000 general fund, with the chamber voting to pass the measure 29–8.

The budget package, as described on the floor by Senator Scott Wiener, funds K–12 education and community colleges, rejects proposed cuts to the University of California and California State University systems, and includes several targeted allocations: $500 million in low-income housing tax credits, $300 million for California Dream for All down payment assistance, $120 million for the multifamily housing program, $100 million for encampment resolution, and $500 million for homeless assistance grants (HAP). Wiener said the package also “provides $15,700,000,000 in combined total reserves for future years.”

Why it matters: The vote concludes the legislature’s work on a budget amid a projected multi‑year revenue shortfall and high federal uncertainty. Supporters said the plan preserves education and social services in a difficult fiscal year while investing in housing, wildfire response and public safety. Opponents complained the process lacked transparency and that the package borrows from reserves and leaves structural deficits in future years.

Key provisions and debate

- Spending and reserves: Wiener told colleagues AB 102 "includes 321,100,000,000 in total spending, 228,400,000,000 of which is general fund," and that the package provides "$15,700,000,000 in combined total reserves for future years." Opponents said reserves and long‑term borrowing were still concerns. Senator Jim Nilo argued the budget “depletes our reserves beyond that which we should” and called the process the worst he had seen for lack of subcommittee review.

- Housing and homelessness: The package directs major new housing investments, including $500 million in low‑income housing tax credits, $300 million for a first‑time buyer program (California Dream for All), $120 million for multifamily housing, and $500 million for the Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention (HAP) program. Senator Aisha Wahab, chair of the Senate housing committee, highlighted the down payment and tax‑credit allocations on the floor.

- Education: The bill provides full funding for K–12 and community colleges and rejects reductions for UC and CSU. The budget includes a $1.7 billion discretionary block grant and a 2.3% cost‑of‑living adjustment for local control funding. Senators on both sides praised protections for higher education while trading views on overall affordability.

- Public safety and firefighters: The package appropriates funding to transition seasonal firefighters to permanent positions (initial $39 million and intent for an additional $78 million) and provides $5,000,000 for a tribal police pilot in public safety trailer language described on the floor.

- Health and Medi‑Cal changes debated in trailer bills: Senate and Assembly trailer bills tied to the package include health provisions (AB 116) that, as presented, implement enrollment freezes and benefit design changes scheduled in future years and would reinstate certain asset limits for seniors. Senator Durazo and others framed changes to immigrant access to programs as a betrayal; Senator Wiener and supporters emphasized protections that the package nevertheless maintains for current enrollees.

Process and political dynamics

Lawmakers repeatedly debated process. Senator Nilo and others objected to moving items without subcommittee hearings; Nilo said several items had not been vetted in subcommittee. Proponents, including Senate President pro Tempore Bill Maguire and Majority Leader María González, defended the outcome as necessary to respond to federal cuts, wildfire recovery and affordability needs, and they urged colleagues to consider the package as a whole.

Votes and related floor actions

- AB 102 (budget bill): passed on third reading, Aye 29, No 8. - SB 103 (conforming adjustments to prior‑year budgets): concurrence with Assembly amendments, Ayes 29, Noes 3. - AB 116 (health omnibus trailer): passed (Ayes 25, Noes 10); the bill contains health program changes described by proponents and opponents on the floor. - AB 118 (human services trailer): passed (Ayes 29, Noes 3). - AB 121 (education trailer): passed (Ayes 32, Noes 1). - AB 123 (higher education trailer): passed (Ayes 38, Noes 0). - AB 134 (public safety trailer): passed (Ayes 29, Noes 9). - SB 120 / SB 120‑style child‑care trailer (SB 120 / SB 120 as filed in supplemental): childcare rate reform and enrollment‑based pay provisions were adopted; concurrence votes on related amendments were recorded (concurrence vote Ayes 30, Noes 7 on the childcare trailer package on the supplemental file).

Appointments confirmed on the floor today

- Ricardo de la Fuente — appointed to the California Community Colleges Board of Governors; confirmed (Ayes 27, Noes 8). - Dr. Erica Pan — confirmed as California state public health officer and director of the California Department of Public Health (Ayes 28, Noes 0).

What remains and next steps

Senators announced additional budget‑related votes and trailer bill work will continue on Monday, June 30, with supplemental trailer bills to be considered. Proponents said further adjustments and implementation details will be addressed in the forthcoming trailer‑bill packages; opponents said some items will require more oversight and review.

Credits: Floor debate, roll calls, and bill descriptions are drawn from the June 27 session of the California State Senate. Direct quotes and vote tallies are taken from the session record.