Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Neighborhood Protections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mayflower Residence replat deferred after neighborhood and council office raise deed-restriction concerns
Summary
The Planning Commission deferred the Mayflower Residence replat after residents and District D council staff raised deed-restriction and neighborhood-character concerns; staff said the subject parcel lies outside the civic association's subdivision boundary and recommended a two-week deferral to clarify materials.
The Houston Planning Commission continued the public hearing and deferred action on the Mayflower Residence replat (Item 104) after multiple residents and the District D council office urged the commission to preserve neighborhood character and clarify deed-restriction questions.
Staff explained the subject property is an out-lot that sits adjacent to East Sunnyside Court but is not within the legal boundary of that subdivision; residents and District D staff said deed restrictions are their primary remaining tool to preserve neighborhood character in Houston, which has no zoning. Planning staff recommended a short deferral to correct packet confusion and allow coordination with legal review.
"Council Member Evan Shabazz is a staunch supporter of deed restrictions," said Steven James, chief of staff for District D, who appeared on behalf of the council member and said the East Sunnyside Court Civic Association opposed the project. Rosalind Richardson, president of the East Sunnyside Court Civic Association, said the neighborhood includes many seniors and is historic; association members asked the commission to delay to allow fuller review.
Staff presenter John Phillips Cedillo told the commission the packet had included an incorrect graphic that mixed materials from a neighboring application; staff therefore asked to defer two weeks so applicants could provide corrected materials and coordinate with legal. "The applicant has still met all notification requirements, and so one deferral should be sufficient to address those concerns," Cedillo said.
Commissioners asked staff to explain potential local tools beyond deed restrictions. Cedillo said the site itself currently has no minimum lot-size or setback explicitly designated on the plat, but a minimum-lot-size or block-face-based "minimalized code" could apply; staff advised that other tools may be available and offered to follow up with the neighborhood on options.
After discussion, the commission voted to defer the item for two weeks. The motion to defer was made by Commissioner Colleague and seconded by Commissioner Baldwin; the chair called for the ayes and declared the motion carried.
The deferral leaves the neighborhood time to meet with staff and legal to resolve the packet errors and to explore possible protections or design constraints. The item is scheduled for continued hearing at the July 10 meeting per staff's filing procedures and the commission's calendar.
