Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the North Street Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brighton council and staff outline North Street redevelopment plan; parking, traffic and building height draw public concern
Summary
Brighton City Council on June 24 discussed a preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) concept for two downtown parcels on North Street and the broader public‑private partnership that could fund a new public parking deck, green space and other downtown amenities.
Get email alerts on the North Street Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brighton City Council on June 24 discussed a preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) concept for two downtown parcels on North Street and the broader public‑private partnership that could fund a new public parking deck, green space and other downtown amenities.
Mayor Christopher Toby told the meeting that DA Building had presented a preliminary PUD concept to the Planning Commission on June 16 and that the commission had given contingent preliminary approval. "This is preliminary. It is not a final site approval," Toby said, adding that final council approval would be required under the city's PUD provisions and only after a negotiated project development agreement and additional public hearings.
That preliminary PUD imagines a five‑story residential building and is tied to a larger development partnership announced in January 2024. City Manager Gretchen Gamolka said the five‑story concept "will provide its own parking for residents and resident guests as well as currently as proposed a 130 for the public," and stressed the proposal remains contingent on a final negotiated development agreement and a Brownfield plan meant to fund public benefits without issuing city debt.
Community Development Manager Michael Caruso described the zoning and planning history for the parcels, saying "the 2 parcels in question are zoned downtown business district" and noting the downtown zoning has allowed higher‑density residential development since updates tied to the city's 2018 master plan and the 2019 zoning ordinance changes. Caruso said the downtown district includes areas where three stories are allowed by right and other locations where four stories can be permitted.
Council members and staff framed the discussion around two persistent challenges: limited city tax base and downtown parking. Council member Bill Albert, who raised concerns about building height, said he wants any final project to be "very much in line with our zoning" and prefers stepbacks above two stories. Council member Ken Schmank and others emphasized the need to explore solutions for downtown parking that do not overly burden city taxpayers.
City staff described components the partnership could include: a separate public parking deck (entirely public parking), donated public parking spaces from the developer, added downtown green space near Mill Pond, upgraded public restrooms and potentially a municipal building. Attorney Sarah Gabis and staff explained that a Brownfield Redevelopment Plan would be developed to test whether tax increment capture from the project could fund those public elements so the city would not need to issue bonds or raise taxes.
Residents who spoke during the public comment period raised traffic and scale concerns. Caroline Passano (445 S. Church St.) said she "doesn't fully support it as the current plan, which is presented of 5 stories" and suggested a thoughtfully designed two‑ to three‑story condominium alternative that would encourage homeownership. Muriel Kayer (910 W. Main St.) asked whether soil remediation would be required for some parcels now owned by a developer. Other speakers, including Ella Nikitian and Susan Walters (907 Brighton Lake Rd.), urged better pedestrian and transit options and expressed worry about increased vehicular traffic on residential streets.
Council and staff emphasized that the project remains at an early stage. Attorney Gabis described the next steps: finalize a Brownfield analysis, hold public hearings required for a Brownfield plan, negotiate and execute a project development agreement if the numbers work, and then process each component through the normal planning‑commission and council public‑hearing sequence. She said some negotiations that involve potential property purchase would occur in closed session but that the Brownfield evaluation and final concept would be public and include opportunities for comment.
Why this matters: downtown merchants and residents told council parking is a frequent complaint and that Main Street serves a broader market beyond the city limits. Mayor Toby noted the downtown serves tens of thousands of people in the surrounding area despite the city's smaller resident population and described balancing fiscal caution with opportunities to secure parking and green space through a public‑private structure. Council members urged continued public input and pledged multiple future public hearings before any final approvals.

