Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Labor topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Union and workers urge scrutiny of operators; commenter urges denial of Fertitta-related suitability
Summary
Public commenters at the Nevada Gaming Commission meeting urged denial of a suitability request tied to operators identified as "Tim and Friti" and criticized Station Casinos' chief legal officeralleging credibility issues tied to a labor dispute; workers from Red Rock described efforts to organize for better pay and conditions.
During the public-comment period at the June 26 Nevada Gaming Commission meeting, several speakers addressed operator suitability and labor issues in Nevada casinos.
A member of the public, Glenn Hunsucker, urged commissioners to deny a request described as "Tim and Friti's request," alleging historical consumer-fraud practices at properties he associated with the operator and citing concerns about card-shufflers and repeated roulette patterns. Hunsucker asked the commission to deny the application on grounds of alleged past misconduct.
Representatives of labor raised concerns about credibility and transparency in corporate testimony. Ira Duyanen, speaking for the Culinary Union, urged the commission to scrutinize Station Casinos' chief legal officer, Jeffrey Welsh (transcript: various spellings), citing testimony from an unfair labor practice trial in which a judge found certain management testimony not credible. Duyanen said the CLO had been involved in management communications and questioned whether that person should be considered a credible witness in regulatory proceedings.
A Red Rock Casino employee, Christopher Meng, identified himself as a line cook and said he had worked at Red Rock for eight years and is fighting for a union contract at Red Rock Casino to secure better pay, working conditions and job security.
These comments were part of the public-comment period; commissioners noted that matters raised in public comment generally could not be acted upon that day but are part of the public record.
No formal regulatory action was taken at the meeting in direct response to these comments; the statements were recorded as public comment and made part of the meeting record.
