Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Conroe council approves water study, TXDOT agreement, CDBG plans, camera contract extension and other items

5080576 · June 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its June 26 meeting the Conroe City Council approved a package of items including a whole-system hydraulic water model, an IH‑45/North Loop 336 advanced funding agreement with TxDOT, multiple grant and contract approvals, and a 10‑year camera contract enhancement. Several items were handled on the consent agenda.

At its June 26, 2025 meeting the Conroe City Council voted on a series of agenda items carried over from a workshop the prior day. The council approved consultant contracts, grant and grant-administration actions, a TxDOT advanced funding agreement, technology contracts and several resolutions. The list below summarizes each item, the action taken and key details recorded at the meeting.

Votes at a glance

- Item 1 — Appeals and waivers to denial of exemption from a temporary moratorium on development: Motion that staff review and approve permits and waivers depending on water capacity; passed (voice vote). (agenda item 1)

- Item 2 — Contract with Lockwood, Andrews & Newman, Inc. (LAN) to conduct a whole-system hydraulic water modeling evaluation and provide recommendations: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 2)

- Item 3 — Proposal for impact-fee study with Freese and Nichols: Approved after debate (voice vote). (agenda item 3)

- Item 4 — Advanced funding agreement with TxDOT for the IH‑45 and North Loop 336 project: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 4)

- Item 5 — Resolution designating authorized signatures for documents pertaining to the CDBG MIT MOD Conroe Sewer Improvement Project: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 5)

- Item 6 — Proposal for grant management from Goodman Corporation for the Fiber Con activity project: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 6)

- Item 7 — 10-year agreement for AI/analytics module enhancement to existing Axon camera contract: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 7)

- Item 8 — Approval of MCHD fire EMS communications network agreement fee: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 8)

- Item 9 — Resolution adopting the CDBG five-year consolidated plan (2025–2029) and the 2025 CDBG annual action plan and authorizing the mayor to sign transmittal documents to HUD: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 9)

- Item 10 — Resolution consenting to the addition of ~29.236 acres to Montgomery County Water Control & Improvement District No. 205: Approved (voice vote). Staff advised the tract is in the ETJ and not currently connected to the city system. (agenda item 10)

- Item 11 — Microsoft licensing split EA to AOSG: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 11)

- Item 12 — Resolution authorizing city attorney to execute letter consenting to assignment of 2019 tax abatement from Conroe Owner LLC to Texas Equity Funding SPE Conroe LLC: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 12)

- Item 13 — Resolution nominating Councilman Harrell and Councilwoman Arthur to serve on the Gulf Coast Economic Development District Board of Directors: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 13)

- Item 14 — Resolution nominating Chief Sims to the Montgomery County Emergency Communications District board of managers: Approved (voice vote). (agenda item 14)

- Items 15–26 — Consent agenda: Approved in its entirety (voice vote).

How votes were recorded: Most passed by voice vote; the meeting transcript records "Aye" and "Motion carries" for the items above. The transcript did not provide roll-call tallies for these items in the record excerpt.

Ending: Many of the approved items authorize staff to finalize agreements or to transmit documents to state or federal agencies; several items (notably the impact-fee study and the water-modeling evaluation) will lead to further staff work and later council consideration.