Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Oversight topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council sends Rampart oversight motion to Public Safety Committee; immediate DOJ briefing request fails
Summary
After extensive debate over outside review of the Rampart scandal and recent press reports, the City Council voted to send a motion on joint investigations to the Public Safety Committee but rejected an immediate council-level request that the U.S. Department of Justice brief the full council.
The Los Angeles City Council on Feb. 29 made two separate procedural decisions after multi-hour debate about the Rampart police scandal and media reports alleging federal-agency involvement.
The council voted 8–3 to send a motion asking for a joint local/state/federal task-force investigation of Rampart-related allegations to the Public Safety Committee for study and recommendations. A separate proposal — a direct letter from the council president requesting a full briefing to council by Department of Justice representatives on an expedited timeline — failed on a 6–5 vote.
Councilmembers and witnesses debated the proper path to restore public confidence. Councilmember Feuer argued for elevating the prosecutorial and investigative effort to the federal level in Washington to ensure objectivity, saying the motion would "call on us to elevate the investigation and the prosecutorial aspects of Rampart to Washington." Several councilmembers, including Councilmember Chick, favored an initial briefing by DOJ or U.S. attorney representatives to educate the council before committing to a specific structure. Councilmember Wax and others pressed that the public needed an outside review equivalent to the Christopher Commission to restore trust.
Los Angeles Police Department Chief William J. Bratton (appeared as "Chief Parks" in the transcript) told the council that some press allegations were unverified and cautioned against removing criminal investigations from LAPD before they conclude. He said internal affairs had opened inquiries into the new allegations and emphasized the importance of allowing ongoing investigations to produce results and evidence before changing the investigative structure.
Public commenters and several councilmembers said the scale of alleged misconduct and the appearance of conflicts warranted external review. Council ultimately chose a measured approach: send the oversight motion to the Public Safety Committee for further development and decline an immediate full-council DOJ briefing request.
