Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Behavioral Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nevada County supervisors renew Turning Point contract as behavioral-health funding rules shift

5074431 · June 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board of Supervisors approved a three-year renewal with Turning Point Community Programs for adult ACT and integrated services while county behavioral-health leaders warned state Behavioral Health Services Act changes will force counties to reallocate mental-health contracts and housing spending.

Nevada County supervisors voted unanimously June 24 to renew a contract with Turning Point Community Programs Inc. to provide adult assertive community treatment and integrated health-care services as the county’s behavioral-health leaders laid out a fiscal shift coming from statewide policy changes.

Health and Human Services Agency Director Ryan Groover told the board that HSA relies heavily on contracts for both mandated services and one-time grants, noting that almost 40% of HSA spending is contracted and “in behavioral health, that’s 70% of their services are contracted services.” Phoebe Bell, the county’s behavioral-health director, said the department has doubled its medical billings following statewide payment-reform changes and highlighted both the financial gains and the new constraints from recent state rules.

Bell said Nevada County billed nearly $40 million in medical services in the agency’s first full year under the new fee-for-service system. That increase, she said, helps the county generate federal Medi‑Cal revenue that can be reinvested in local services and infrastructure — including the county’s plans for an inpatient facility. But she warned that the state’s passage of Proposition 1 (the Behavioral Health Services Act) changes how Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) money may be used.

"Under BHSA, we will now be required to spend 30% of our annual revenue on housing, not on the services that support housing, but on literal housing," Bell told supervisors. She estimated the county’s share will be roughly $2 million a year and warned counties will lose flexibility over prevention dollars that the state will reallocate.

Bell also explained that spending MHSA funds for housing, which is not Medi‑Cal billable, reduces the county’s ability to pull down federal match for medical services: "If we pull a dollar out of the medical system, we're losing $2 of service," she said, describing the tradeoff between capital housing expenditures and billable medical services.

Supervisors praised the department’s billing gains but raised questions about timing and oversight of the new state planning process required under BHSA. Supervisor Hardy asked whether the integrated plan would return to the board with enough time for local edits before any state deadline; Bell said the county will begin a community planning process now and expects to submit an integrated plan to the state by March 2026.

When the Turning Point renewal came up as a separate consent item, the board approved the resolution renewing the contract for the period beginning July 1, 2025. The motion’s text listed a maximum contract amount and the renewed term; clerk votes recorded unanimous approval.

The county’s behavioral-health leaders told the board they intend to help local contractors adapt by using MHSA innovation funds to hire a consultant and by conducting fiscal modeling so community partners can diversify revenue. Bell framed the changes as both a risk and an opportunity: stronger Medi‑Cal collections could allow system growth, while the BHSA-driven shift in allowable spending and greater state oversight will require substantial local adjustments.

The board action: supervisors approved the Turning Point renewal. County staff said they will return with detailed planning materials and contract adjustments as the state rule changes take effect.

Why it matters: Nevada County’s behavioral-health system depends heavily on contracted providers. The incoming state-level rules change how MHSA funds are allocated and increase state oversight, forcing counties to rework contracts and local service mixes — a shift that affects providers, housing investments, and access to billable Medi‑Cal revenues.