Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Agriculture topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Iron County approves 171.5-acre agricultural protection area, contingent on rezoning
Summary
The Iron County Commission approved a proposal to designate about 171.5 acres as an agricultural protection area under Utah Code 17-41, contingent on rezoning 52.25 acres to RA-20; commissioners and planning staff described the protections and the rezoning requirement during a public hearing.
The Iron County Commission approved a proposed agricultural protection area totaling about 171.5 acres following a public hearing Wednesday, with the approval made contingent on rezoning 52.25 acres now zoned R-1.5 and R-5 to RA-20.
The measure designates two clusters of parcels — one roughly 119 acres near 2800 North and a second cluster about 52.25 acres near Fife Town — for protection under Utah Code 17-41, which limits local government interference with normal agricultural practices and requires notice on adjacent subdivision plats. Planning staff and the county agricultural advisory board recommended approval after amending the applicant’s map to include several small, contiguous parcels in the total acreage.
County staff described the statutory benefits of an agricultural protection area in the hearing: government cannot change zoning or condemn land inside the area without the landowner’s consent, normal agricultural practices are barred from qualifying as nuisance actions, and future developers must note the adjacent protected area on subdivision plats. Planning staff also noted changes to county and state procedures that now require additional public notices and advisory-board review before a protection area can be established.
Commissioners and staff discussed a technical issue raised during the review: several parcels included in the applicant’s map were zoned R-1.5 or R-5, not in an agricultural zone. Staff and the agricultural advisory board concluded the application could proceed only if those parcels were rezoned to RA-20 to match the statutory requirement that protected land be zoned for agricultural use. Planning staff said the applicant (listed on the agenda as LeGrand Webster and Reed) is willing to file the rezoning application; the county will consider the rezoning at the planning commission’s July meeting and return to the commission thereafter.
There were no formal objections recorded during the public-notice period, though staff said a number of residents called with questions. The commission voted to approve the protection-area designation with the rezoning contingency; the designation will run for 20 years and automatically renew unless the commission takes action.
The commission’s action does not itself rezone the property; county staff will process the separate rezone application for the affected 52.25 acres before the protection area takes effect on those parcels.
Additional procedural documents and the planning commission’s recommendation were noted in the record; commissioners said the designation is intended to preserve ongoing agricultural activity and reduce future land-use conflicts.
