Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commission Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a glance: SFPUC commission approvals and procedural votes from the meeting
Summary
The commission approved corrected minutes, accepted the consent calendar, approved adjustments to several contracts and grants, and took procedural votes about closed session disclosure; this roundup lists each recorded motion and outcome.
This meeting included several recorded motions and votes. The commission took these actions (motions, recorded outcomes and key details are listed below).
Votes at a glance
- Approval of corrected minutes (Item 3): commissioners voted to approve the minutes of June 10 as corrected for the attendance list; the item passed (recorded: President Stacy — Aye; Commissioner Leberone/Laberoni — Aye; Commissioner Thurlow — Aye).
- Consent calendar (Item 7): the commission approved the consent calendar (recorded ayes; item passes).
- Contract contingency and duration increase, HH‑TEN13 Moccasin Compound Water System Filtration (Item 9): staff requested and the commission approved an increase of $1,500,000 to cost contingency and an increase of 266 calendar days to duration contingency for contract HH‑TEN13 with Sierra Mountain Construction, Inc.; revised cost limit reported near $6,100,000 and revised duration limit reported as 646 days ending 06/30/2026. The commission approved the adjustments (recorded ayes).
- Accept completed work, contract WWWDot704 (Item 10): the commission authorized acceptance of work performed by JDB & Sons Construction, Inc. under contract WWWDot704 (various locations, Sewer Replacement No. 9), including modification No. 4 that decreased the contract amount by $10,750 and increased duration by 11 calendar days; item passed.
- Closed session procedural votes: the commission voted to assert attorney‑client privilege for three closed‑session matters and later reported the commission had voted to recommend all three settlements in closed session; the commission then voted not to disclose the attorney‑client discussion (motions recorded and passed).
Procedural notes: movers and seconders were not consistently identified in the audio transcript for several routine items; the transcript records the commission's roll call aye votes for approval as noted above. Where motions were informational presentations, staff reported results or requested the approval and the commission recorded the outcome in open session.
