Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council places Rose Holdings rezoning petition on docket; two members recuse

5065788 · June 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lexington-Fayette Urban County Council voted to place PLN MAR 20417 (Rose Holdings Lexington LLC) — a petition to rezone 1899 Parkers Mill Road from R-1A to planned neighborhood residential R-3 — on the docket without a public hearing. Two council members recused.

The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Council voted June 24 to place PLN MAR 20417 — a petition from Rose Holdings Lexington LLC to rezone 1899 Parkers Mill Road from single-family residential (R-1A) to planned neighborhood residential (R-3) — on the docket without a public hearing.

Vice Mayor Wu moved to place the item on the docket; Councilmember Baxter seconded. Councilmember Savigny said, “I'll be recusing from item number 7, as I've been very involved as a parishioner at Saint Rayfield's Next Door at 1891 Parkers Mill since '96.” Councilmember Ehlinger also announced a recusal, saying his mother lives nearby and he “will also be recusing.” The mayor confirmed the motion passed “with 2 recusals.”

The petition covers approximately 11.587 net acres (11.924 gross acres) at 1899 Parkers Mill Road and, if advanced, will appear as a first-reading ordinance under the council's legislative process. The council did not hold a public hearing on the motion to place the item on the docket; the action taken was procedural to add the ordinance to the council calendar.

Why it matters: Rezoning petitions determine what types of housing or development a parcel may host; placing an item on the docket moves it forward in the legislative process so that it can be scheduled for public hearings and subsequent readings.

What happened next: The council completed the docket vote and proceeded with other business. No substantive discussion of the petition's merits or conditions was recorded during the docket placement; the two recusals were entered on the record.

Votes at a glance: PLN MAR 20417 — Motion to place on docket without public hearing: moved by Vice Mayor Wu; seconded by Councilmember Baxter; outcome — approved (passes, recorded with two recusals: Councilmember Savigny and Councilmember Ehlinger). Detailed roll-call tallies were not specified on the record.