Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Extended Stay Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission pauses extended-stay ordinance work, urges further review of annexation and zoning
Summary
Commission members agreed to take more time on the extended-stay (motels/hotels used for long-term occupancy) draft and asked members and staff to research state annexation law, nontransient definitions, and the town's annexation map before the next meeting.
Get email alerts on the Extended Stay Annexation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Bicknell Planning Commission agreed to continue work on a proposed extended-stay ordinance and to review related annexation and zoning issues over the coming month, citing concerns about hotels converting to long-term housing and the regulatory differences between transient and nontransient occupancy.
Commissioners discussed local examples in nearby towns and referenced state law distinguishing transient stays from nontransient occupancy. “State law and state construction and building codes recognize important differences between transient and nontransient use of hotel and other similar rooms for rent,” said Darcy, Planning Commission member, summarizing the commission’s rationale for a separate local rule. Commissioners noted state code generally treats rentals over 30 days as nontransient.
The commission discussed local experience in Salina and Richfield where small hotels rented long-term had been associated with deterioration and, in one cited case, a fire at a converted property. Commissioners said the draft extended-stay ordinance is seven pages long and contains detailed definitions and requirements; they agreed they were not ready to finish the section at this meeting and recommended members submit comments and return with a fresh read at the next meeting.
The group also raised annexation and zoning issues tied to anticipated county-driven industrial development near the town expansion area. Commissioners asked staff to confirm whether proposed annexation authority under recent state law changes (discussed in the meeting as “4 18” or similar) affects how the town may pursue annexation, and whether the town’s annexation ordinance needs update. Commissioners said annexation affects whether properties must follow town ordinances and whether they may access town water and services.
“I think what we do is we look at this for the next month, get our comments in so we can come in here, have it fresh in our mind,” Jim, Planning Commission member, said, describing the commission’s plan to complete section-by-section review at the next meeting. The commission did not take a formal vote on the extended-stay draft; instead members directed staff and commissioners to research statutes, the town’s annexation map, and related ordinances and to resume substantive drafting at the next meeting.
