Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves 14‑lot subdivision at Holmes and County Line Road, adds fire‑resistant fence condition
Summary
The Planning Commission approved tentative tract map TTM 20699 to subdivide a 3.24‑acre parcel into 14 single‑family lots, adopting CEQA exemptions and adding a requirement for fire‑resistant perimeter fencing on exterior lots after resident concerns about privacy and fencing materials.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Yucaipa Planning Commission on a split vote approved tentative tract map TTM 20699, a proposal to subdivide a 3.24‑acre parcel at the northeast corner of Holmes Street and County Line Road into 14 single‑family lots with a new public roadway and a cul‑de‑sac.
Staff said the subdivision is consistent with the city's single‑family residential (7,200‑square‑foot minimum) designation and recommended adoption of CEQA categorical exemptions (Guidelines §15332 — Class 32 infill exemption). The project design calls for landscaping along County Line Road, stormwater treatment via drainage swales, and frontage improvements; the record includes notice to neighbors within 300 feet and two responses raising concerns about scale and requesting a perimeter wall and single‑story homes.
Why it matters: Approval clears the way for lot sales or future development of 14 homes on a formerly vacant parcel; the commission also added a condition aimed at addressing neighbors’ privacy and fire‑safety concerns.
Commission discussion and public comments Commissioners and staff discussed development impact fees, a possible Community Facilities District (CFD, commonly called Mello‑Roos) and a Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District (LLMD) that would fund long‑term services and common‑area maintenance for new development. Staff explained that development impact fees pay for infrastructure improvements, while a CFD can fund ongoing public‑service costs and an LLMD covers maintenance of common landscaping and stormwater features.
Resident Amy Mulder, whose backyard borders the site, told the commission she was concerned about loss of view and privacy if two‑story homes are built, uncertainty about the block wall location, and reported information from staff about possible home sizes and market pricing. Staff clarified that minimum lot standards allow one‑ or two‑story homes per the development code, that average new homes the city is seeing are about 2,200–2,300 square feet (the 725‑square‑foot minimum is a theoretical minimum), and that specific home sizes/prices will be set by future builders or buyers.
The applicant’s representative, Bernie Mayer of Citec Engineering, confirmed the project has been reviewed with the owner and that the project file will require architectural review if a single developer pursues a repeating design for the entire site. Mayer said block walls are required along the project frontages (County Line Road and Holmes Street) but not around the entire perimeter; he also said developers commonly coordinate with adjacent owners about replacing or matching existing fences.
Commission action Before voting on the tract map, the commission voted to add a condition requiring a “fire‑resistant” fence on individual lots that border existing residences (exterior perimeter lots). The motion to add the fire‑resistant perimeter fencing passed on a 3–2 vote. The commission then voted to accept staff’s recommendation and approve tentative tract map TTM 20699 (and the associated findings and CEQA exemption); that motion passed 4–1.
What was decided formally - The commission approved TTM 20699, finding the project consistent with the General Plan and Development Code and directing staff to file the applicable CEQA notices (Class 32 infill exemption). - The commission added a condition requiring fire‑resistant fencing for exterior lots bordering existing residences (affecting eight lots by staff estimate).
Details and next steps The project’s approvals do not set final building designs or prices; architectural review will be required if a single developer proposes repeating designs for the full subdivision. If lots are sold individually, architectural review would not be automatic. The record shows two neighbor responses and staff’s recommended conditions of approval; the project also must annex into an LLMD for landscape and lighting maintenance. Staff said a fiscal study to set per‑unit CFD assessments will be prepared.
Closing note The approvals include standard conditions and CEQA findings; the tract can proceed toward map recordation and future building permits subject to the conditions the commission adopted.

