Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the County Council Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board hears County Council reports: Bosley PUD review and Oella Commercial Revitalization District
Summary
The Planning Board received a report on two recent County Council actions: Resolution 25-25 approving review of a planned unit development (Bosley) at 400 Georgia Court for a senior living community, and Resolution 28-25 establishing the Oella Commercial Revitalization District to incentivize exterior improvements and reinvestment.
Get email alerts on the County Council Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Baltimore County Planning Board received a report June 17 summarizing two recent County Council actions.
Resolution 25-25 authorizes review of a proposed planned unit development (PUD) known as the Bosley on a 4.5-acre site at 400 Georgia Court in the Southland Hills area of the Fifth Councilmanic District. The site, zoned DR 5.5 and entirely within the IRDLE, is currently improved with a large vacant continuing-care facility. The applicant proposes redeveloping the site as a two- and three-story senior living community with approximately 103 units of mixed sizes. The application asserts an environmental benefit by seeking at least a silver rating under the National Green Building Standards and proposes maintaining lawn and green space facing Georgia Court along with community access to interior and exterior meeting spaces.
Resolution 28-25 establishes the Oella Commercial Revitalization District. The county’s commercial revitalization district program provides incentives to property owners and businesses in designated areas to improve exteriors and to develop or redevelop underused properties. The council cited the need to stimulate public and private investment and renewed interest from residents and adjacent communities; the district boundary is shown in the resolution’s Exhibit A.
The Planning Board received the council report for the record; no action by the Planning Board was required at the June 17 meeting.

