Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Windows topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

HARB continues 32 St. Francis Street case; board seeks wood-window specifications and stucco history

3395552 · May 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board continued an after‑the‑fact and future work application at 32 St. Francis Street after staff found missing window specifications; the board asked for wood replacement window specs, window installation details and documentation on the building’s stucco history before returning on June 18.

HARB continued the application for after‑the‑fact administrative changes at 32 St. Francis Street (HP2025-0516), where the owner has completed or proposed wholesale window replacement on side and rear elevations, a new canopy, a modified front balcony and alterations to a detached garage. Staff said a window-condition survey had been provided but noted that the applicant had not supplied detailed specifications for new wood replacement windows; the structure’s painted rough stucco cladding raised additional questions because an earlier (2001) certificate of appropriateness discussion had flagged stucco as a character-defining element.

Applicants Isaiah Duff and John Allman said they had supplied elevations and some details and that they intend to use wood windows; the board asked for section drawings (head, jamb and sill), material samples, and clarity on whether the proposal would alter the existing stucco texture. Members said they would not delegate final review of the window choice to staff in this case and asked for fuller details on the proposed staircase replacement, garage door design and any new exterior light fixtures.

The board also requested evidence on when the existing rough stucco was applied; if the stucco itself is historic it likely should be retained, board members said. The applicant was continued to the June 18 meeting with instructions to deliver the requested drawings and materials for inclusion in the staff packet.