Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Clermont County commissioners, May 21, 2025
Summary
Summary of non‑consent actions the board approved, including vendor contracts, bid awards, legal notices and agreements; abstentions and an excused commissioner are noted where they occurred.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes Summary topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Clermont County Board of Commissioners approved the following non‑consent items at its May 21, 2025 meeting. Items are listed by agenda number with the stated action and the meeting outcome.
Item 10 — Approve payments to vendors: $2,379,846.35 (resolution 057‑25). Outcome: approved (roll call: Commissioner Bonnie Bachelor yes; Commissioner Claire Corcoran yes; Commissioner David L. Painter yes).
Item 11 — Authorize execution of Local Workforce Development subgrant agreement (Area 12, ODJFS funding for period 7/1/25–6/30/27). Outcome: approved (roll call indicates affirmative votes).
Item 12 — Memorandum of understanding: DJFS/CFC operational reimbursement for SFY 2026 (amount not to exceed $79,651). Outcome: approved; Commissioner Corcoran abstained (noted conflict: serves on related board).
Item 13 — Participation agreement for Clear Services subscriber agreement (criminal/locate data) effective 6/1/2025–5/31/2027. Outcome: approved; Commissioner David L. Painter recorded as abstaining.
Item 14 — Authorize advertisement: Clermont County economic development strategic plan RFP (proposals due 6/26/2025). Outcome: approved.
Item 15 — Execute agreement for 2025 bridge load ratings (Michael Baker International), not to exceed $70,300 (ODOT reimbursement). Outcome: approved.
Item 16 — Roadway maintenance agreement renewal with Union Township. Outcome: approved.
Item 17 — Award bid: 2025 road resurfacing program (phase 2) to John R. Jurgensen, $3,324,971.84. Outcome: approved.
Item 18 — Publish legal notice and schedule public hearing to amend subdivision regulations (public hearing set for 7/9/2025). Outcome: approved.
Item 19 — Award contract: EMA Center renovation to Kramer & Feldman, $338,583; completion by 12/31/2025. Outcome: approved.
Item 20 — Re‑advertise bids: Animal shelter outdoor kennel expansion (rebid); mandatory pre‑bid 6/5/2025; bids due 6/26/2025. Outcome: approved (includes $20,000 Purina donation to be used for project; scope descoped to ~30 kennels).
Item 21 — Extend Utter Construction contract for water/wastewater maintenance through 8/24/2026. Outcome: approved.
Item 22 — Advertise for bids: BMW treatment plant pump rehabilitation; engineer's estimate ~$150,000. Outcome: approved.
Item 23 — Do not proceed with Woodville Pike sewer petition (Goshen Township); notify affected property owners. Outcome: approved.
Item 24 — Authorize execution: amendment No. 1 to Lumenet professional services agreement (30‑day extension through 6/20/2025 at no cost). Outcome: approved.
Item 25 — Adopt resolution endorsing OVRDC Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy and remit participation share $42,825 (FY26). Outcome: approved; Commissioner Bachelor abstained due to OVRDC board service.
Item 26 — Publish legal notice for designation of public depositories (estimated daily aggregate up to $220,000,000 for 8/24/2025–8/23/2029). Outcome: approved.
Item 27 — Letter of engagement: annual audit engagement with Julian & Grube, Inc., for 2024 at $97,500. Outcome: approved.
Added item (after presentation and tabling): Amendment No. 2 to Federal Engineering services agreement for microwave procurement and implementation support (not to exceed $238,624). The board first added the item to the agenda, tabled it to review scope and then — after executive session and receipt of scope details — approved the amendment. Outcome: approved (recorded yes votes; Commissioner Bonnie Bachelor excused at later roll calls).
Votes and abstentions recorded above reflect roll calls taken at the meeting. Where the record showed an explicit abstention, it is noted. Several routine consent items not debated at length were approved during the consent portion of the meeting and are not listed here.

