Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing Displacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Norfolk council for concrete plans on affordable housing after Tidewater Gardens redevelopment
Summary
Public commenters told the council that demolition of public-housing sites and redevelopment plans have left many former Tidewater Gardens residents without affordable options, and they urged the city to adopt replacement-housing requirements and clearer relocation commitments.
Several residents and community organizers used public comment time at the June 10 Norfolk City Council meeting to urge the city to produce concrete replacement housing plans for people displaced by the redevelopment of Tidewater Gardens and to address a broader affordable-housing crisis.
Tiara Lassiter, a former Tidewater Gardens resident, said residents expected replacement housing on the redeveloped land and cited relocation outcomes for the original community: “305 households accepted a housing choice voucher…207 households relocated to project based vouchers…A 102 households were evicted, deceased, moved without notice, rented elsewhere,” she said, asking how many residents from Tidewater Gardens were being housed in new developments.
Monet Johnson, an organizer from Argonne Avenue, framed the issue as an ongoing housing shortage and flood-stress problem that requires ensuring displaced households have access to comparable housing. She said the city is “a third of the land that used to be there” and urged the council to ensure adequate replacement housing and relocation options.
Other speakers, including Raytron White and Sasha Simmons (a Calvert Square resident), emphasized that planned demolitions of Calvert Square and Youngs Terrace will remove more units from the housing stock and urged the city to act proactively to avoid further displacement. Simmons asked councilmembers to be visible and collaborative with residents during transitions and relocations.
One commenter proposed a city ordinance requiring 10% of new units to be set aside for households at 50% of area median income; speakers framed the suggestion as an example of the type of policy they expect from council. Commenters repeatedly cited eviction and homelessness pressures and said many low-income households cannot reach the city’s median-income thresholds for new development.
What the meeting record shows: council members acknowledged the concerns and referenced ongoing city work, including the mayor’s housing commission and the SPAC committee, but the meeting did not produce any binding replacement-housing ordinance or new funding commitments. Several speakers urged concrete steps and timelines; council members asked staff and commissions to continue work on housing ideas outside the scope of this meeting.
