Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenter urges Nevada Ethics Commission to 'grow some teeth' on enforcement

5031607 · June 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A member of the public told the commission its enforcement is too weak compared with professional licensing bodies and urged stronger penalties and use of statutory authority.

During the meeting’s public-comment period a member of the public criticized the commission’s enforcement record and urged the body to impose stiffer penalties and make fuller use of its statutory authority.

The commenter contrasted the commission’s penalties with those imposed by the Nevada Real Estate Division, saying that real-estate regulators “impose fines exceeding a $100,000 and revoke licenses when warranted” and that “that is what real enforcement looks like.” The speaker argued that for public officials, ethics enforcement has little consequence: “For ambitious officials, the ethics commission acts are simply a cost of doing business, and it's a small price to pay for money, power, and position.”

The speaker cited specific examples and allegations about public figures to illustrate the point, saying former city council member Naomi Jordan received a $3,060 fine and then a salary increase and that “sheriff Lombardo used his elected position dozens, perhaps hundreds of times, to campaign for governor” and was fined $20. The commenter urged the commission to “be the vital backstop the people in Nevada need … stop being an insignificant cost of doing business. It's time to grow some teeth.”

Commissioners acknowledged the comments. Commissioner Lowry said the public comment’s timing aligned with the commission’s internal-reputation survey and encouraged staff to seek public feedback. Executive Director Russell Armstrong and other commissioners noted limits imposed by statute and the commission’s jurisdiction when explaining why some enforcement outcomes appear modest.

The remarks were delivered during the meeting’s public-comment period; no formal action was taken in response to the comments during the meeting.