Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Commission on Ethics adopts amended hearing rules, narrows definition of 'subject' and makes anonymous-complaint rejection discretionary
Summary
The Commission on Ethics voted unanimously to adopt two targeted amendments to its administrative regulations, restoring the definition of “subject” to mean a public officer or public employee and making rejection of certain anonymous or defective complaints discretionary.
The Commission on Ethics voted unanimously to adopt two targeted amendments to its administrative regulations, restoring the definition of “subject” to refer to a public officer or public employee and making rejection of certain anonymous or defective complaints discretionary.
Executive Director Armstrong told commissioners the agency’s regulations are procedural rather than substantive: "for the ethics commission, all the actual ethics rules ... are set in statute. Our administrative code really is a procedure manual for how the commission conducts its business," he said.
Why it matters: the changes were crafted to address concerns raised by the Legislative Commission and to improve the chance the regulatory package will be approved there. One change narrows the commission’s regulatory language so that it does not expand the commission’s jurisdiction to all persons or businesses; the other adjusts the agency’s ability to…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

