Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cjc Strategic Priorities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CJC subcommittee discusses weaving racial equity into priorities; members emphasize alternatives to incarceration, behavioral health and reentry
Summary
During the same meeting, members of the CJC racial disparities subcommittee discussed a strategic planning process (to be finalized by September) and recommended priority areas including alternatives to incarceration, behavioral health/substance-use response, reentry, housing and maximizing existing programs.
Get email alerts on the Cjc Strategic Priorities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members of the Criminal Justice Council (CJC) racial disparities subcommittee spent a portion of the meeting discussing a CJC strategic planning process and how the subcommittee should prioritize racial equity within that plan. The planning timeline cited in the discussion calls for a strategic plan to be "buttoned up by September," and staff said the CJC executive supported the Office of Justice Reform in leading the strategy work.
Why it matters: committee members framed racial equity as a cross-cutting requirement for program design and highlighted areas where targeted work could reduce disparities in incarceration and court outcomes.
Discussion highlights
- Alternatives to incarceration: multiple members said alternatives to incarceration should be the top priority. One committee member said alternatives were a "huge" priority given the visible racial disparities in the jail population.
- Reentry and housing: committee members identified reentry supports and housing as essential strategies to reduce repeat involvement in the criminal legal system.
- Behavioral health and substance-use response: members urged deeper attention to behavioral health and substance-use disorder pathways that intersect with policing, booking and courts. A planned MacArthur-funded sequential intercept model training was mentioned; staff said findings from that training will be reported back to the subcommittee.
- Youth justice interest and data limits: several members asked for more juvenile/adult cross-tabulations. Staff clarified that the existing data-sharing agreements were primarily structured around the adult criminal justice system, which is why most dashboards focused on adults; members suggested future work look at youth-adult comparisons where data availability allows.
Notable remarks
- A member identified as Peter (full name not provided) urged the committee to consider historical policy decisions and structural drivers when designing interventions and said, "I would say it's more important to get the disparity down than to just get the general rate down."
- Commissioner Beinai and others raised youth justice and juvenile/adult comparisons as important for future data work. Members asked staff to pursue cross-sector analyses that include behavioral health and homelessness intersections.
Next steps and logistics
- Staff asked subcommittee members for input on where racial equity should be embedded in priority areas such as behavioral health response, violence prevention, pre-arrest and pretrial alternatives, reentry, and housing. - A MacArthur-funded sequential intercept training will finish at the end of the month and staff will report back to the subcommittee on findings. - The subcommittee’s next meeting was set for August 12 at 12:15 (date/time provided in meeting).
Ending
After additional procedural items, a motion to adjourn was moved and seconded; the meeting adjourned.
