Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House amends grant bill for violent‑incident clearance technology; rural carve‑out amendment fails
Summary
Members considered House Bill 1511 on grants for violent-incident clearance and technological investigative methods. Lawmakers rejected an amendment to reserve 40% of funds for rural agencies but adopted a technical amendment changing reporting deadlines; multiple other amendments were debated or withdrawn.
House Bill 1511, described on the floor as providing “miscellaneous provisions and for violent incident clearance and technological investigative methods,” drew floor amendments about geographic allocation and reporting.
Representative Hamm offered Amendment A00916 to require at least 40% of grants be directed to rural law‑enforcement agencies, arguing rural departments are underresourced and that 72% of Pennsylvania is rural. Representative Briggs, the bill’s primary sponsor, urged members to vote no and noted the bill already reserves 10% for rural recipients and that the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency (PCCD) is best placed to administer grants. The House recorded 100 ayes and 102 nays; the amendment failed.
Representative Kerwin moved to suspend the rules and offered Amendment A00974, described on the floor as an agreed technical amendment that clarifies reporting requirements and changes the PCCD annual reporting date to March 31 (from December 31). Members adopted A00974 unanimously; the clerk recorded 202 ayes and 0 nays on the amendment.
Other floor activity included withdrawn amendments and debate about eligibility and grant administration. Representative White had earlier offered and then withdrawn an amendment related to sentencing and grant eligibility.
Why it matters: The bill creates or expands competitive grants for law-enforcement clearance of violent incidents and for technological investigative tools. How grant dollars are allocated—urban versus rural—and the reporting cadence affect who receives funds and how success is tracked.
What’s next: The bill was amended on the floor and ordered reprinted; the transcript records the amendment votes above and the bill’s continued consideration.
