Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Margate CRA approves surveillance and community policing technology purchase; executive director signs $49,467 Avigilon camera contract
Summary
The Margate CRA on Wednesday approved a resolution authorizing the purchase of surveillance equipment and supplies for community policing innovations under Section 163.387(6)(c), Florida Statutes, and the CRA’s executive director reported signing a $49,467 contract for Avigilon security cameras and network installation at a park.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Margate Community Redevelopment Agency approved a resolution authorizing purchase of surveillance equipment and supplies associated with community policing innovations under state law. Board members discussed allowable uses and technology types, including license-plate readers (LPRs) and message boards, and approved the resolution on a unanimous roll-call vote.
A presentation noted the statutory basis for the purchase as an allowable CRA expenditure when used for public safety innovations; the staff cited Section 163.387(6)(c), Florida Statutes, while cautioning the board that specific deployment locations and technical details were not discussed in open session. Board members who had attended CRA training said the statute allows certain public-safety technology purchases that support innovative approaches.
Separately, during the executive director’s report, Jim Nardi said he approved a contract for Avigilon security cameras and associated network installation for a park in the amount of $49,467. Nardi described the purchase as part of continued efforts to install security and surveillance cameras throughout the city’s parks.
The resolution passed unanimously. Roll-call recorded: Board member Schwartz — yes; Board member Serio — yes; Board member Simone — yes; Vice Chair Antonio Rosano — yes; Chair Eric Casciano — yes.
Board members noted they would not discuss specific camera locations in open session. The board gave staff authority to proceed with purchases consistent with the resolution and applicable law.
