Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities Water topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cooper City approves multiple water agreements for connections outside city limits amid split votes
Summary
The Cooper City Commission approved several resolutions authorizing water service agreements for properties outside city limits after debate over whether the city should supply water beyond its borders. Some commissioners expressed concern and at least one voted no on specific agreements.
The Cooper City Commission on an agenda item about outside-city water connections approved multiple resolutions authorizing execution of individual water service agreements for properties outside Cooper City, after commissioners debated whether the city should continue supplying water beyond its borders.
Commissioner Mallozzi said, "I don't wanna provide water outside the city," and moved to remove several items from the consent agenda before discussion, citing a policy preference to limit service to city residents. Other commissioners defended the agreements as revenue-producing and said recent rate adjustments reduce the risk to residents. The city manager and staff said rates were updated recently to incorporate CPI and that a full rate study is planned for future work to align rates with a forthcoming master plan.
The commission considered at least four separate resolutions authorizing execution of water agreements for specified numbers of Equivalent Residential Connections (ERCs). In the meeting record, Commissioners generally voted to approve the agreements, though one commissioner recorded a "no" vote on specific items. One agreement (Resolution 25-38) was approved with a condition that staff confirm the executing party before the agreement is finalized.
Why it matters: selling discrete ERCs to properties outside municipal boundaries can provide revenue to offset system costs, but it also raises policy questions about long-term service obligations, infrastructure capacity and fairness between city residents and nonresident customers.
What the commission debated and decided - Commissioner Mallozzi argued the city should revert to serving only properties within its corporate limits. She asked staff to hold several consent items for discussion and voted against at least two of the outside-city agreements. - Commissioner Schroeder and Commissioner Smith said that, provided the city properly prices outside connections and updates rates to reflect full costs, continuing limited outside connections can help offset infrastructure costs for residents. - The city manager and staff said rates were recently increased pursuant to an ordinance to allow CPI adjustments and that a rate study is planned to set future rates for needed capital improvements. - One approval included a condition: staff must confirm the proper contracting party (the recorded item cited an executed document signed by a Michael Governe and staff said they would confirm the relationship with Stallion LLC before finalizing the agreement).
Votes at a glance (as recorded in the meeting transcript) - Resolution 25-33 (water agreement for 1 ERC at $4,993.35): Approved (majority affirmative vote recorded) - Resolution 25-34 (water agreement for 2.5 ERCs at $12,370.87): Approved; Commissioner Mallozzi recorded a "no" vote on this item - Resolution (duplicate/related water agreement recorded later for 1 ERC at $4,993.35): Approved; Commissioner Mallozzi recorded a "no" vote on this item - Resolution 25-38 (water agreement with 6225 Stallion LLC for 2.5 ERCs at $12,370.87): Approved subject to staff confirming the proper party to execute the agreement
Discussion, conditions and next steps - Staff will proceed to execute approved agreements consistent with the conditions noted by the commission (including confirming signatory relationships where the record left that open). - The city will continue a rate study and said the current rate updates (CPI-based adjustments) already increased the outside-user rates severalfold from months earlier; staff said a comprehensive rate study is forthcoming. - Commissioners requested that if multifamily or commercial properties outside the city seek service, the utility department notify the commission and require a different review process (zoning/compatibility confirmation and ordinance compliance).
Proper names and sources cited in the meeting record include: Cooper City, Stallion LLC, and the referenced resolution numbers as listed in the meeting materials.
