Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Groundwater Monitoring Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays decision on Salinas Valley groundwater monitoring fees after debate over de‑minimis wells; GSA offers initial registration grants
Summary
Monterey County supervisors voted to delay a decision by 30 days on a new groundwater monitoring regulatory fee schedule proposed by the Water Resources Agency and the Salinas Valley Basin GSA, after concerns about costs falling on small domestic (de‑minimis) well owners.
Monterey County supervisors voted June 3 to delay for one month a decision on the proposed groundwater monitoring program regulatory fees that would fund a county‑run monitoring program for the Salinas Valley Basin.
Amy Woodrow, senior hydrologist at the county Water Resources Agency, outlined the draft fee schedule presented to the board by the agency and by representatives of the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA). The proposal included five per‑well fees aimed at funding registration, annual renewal, groundwater extraction reporting, groundwater level monitoring and seawater‑intrusion quality monitoring. Example fees included an initial well registration proposed at $160.16 per well, an annual registration renewal at $21.86 per well and groundwater level monitoring at $117.68 per well.
The board’s debate focused on whether smaller domestic wells — so‑called de‑minimis wells pumping 2 acre‑feet per year or less under the state definition — should be included and whether the proposed fee structure would disproportionately affect small users. "We had a range of comments about de‑minimis users and fairness," Supervisor Chris Church said during the discussion.
Salinas Valley Basin GSA staff told the board the GSA has grant funds available to cover the proposed one‑time initial registration fee for domestic well owners during the initial registration period. Sarah Hargrave, deputy general manager of the GSA, said the agency “does have grant funds that could be utilized for the initial well registration fee ... and we would like to proceed with ... covering that one‑time cost.”
The board voted to delay the decision for 30 days to allow staff to clarify legal constraints under Proposition 26 (which governs regulatory fees), confirm how other groundwater agencies structure fees and return with a clearer explanation of options for protecting low‑income and de‑minimis users while funding the monitoring program. County counsel told the board some options are limited under Proposition 26 but that staff would return with alternatives.
Why it matters: The proposed fee would create a permanent revenue stream for a county‑run groundwater monitoring program the GSA requested. The program is intended to support groundwater sustainability planning and respond to state requirements under SGMA. But how to apportion costs fairly between agricultural, municipal and small domestic users is a live policy question with potential financial impact on rural households.
What’s next: Staff will return in roughly 30 days with more detail on legal constraints, fee alternatives and outreach results. The GSA said it can use existing grant funds to offset the one‑time registration fee for small domestic wells during the initial sign‑up.
