Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Manhattan CB2 panel presses DOT on ADA rules, issues conditional feedback on multiple outdoor-dining applications
Summary
At its May 28 meeting the Manhattan Community Board 2 Outdoor Dining Working Group heard public comment about sidewalk- and roadway-cafe applications, pressed DOT and FDNY on unclear clearance rules and voted to issue conditional approvals or denials for multiple sidewalk- and roadway-cafe applications pending plan revisions.
Valerie Delarosa, chair of the Outdoor Dining Working Group of Manhattan Community Board 2, opened the meeting May 28 by calling the group to order and reviewing the agenda of sidewalk- and roadway-cafe applications referred by the NYC Department of Transportation (DOT).
The meeting drew owners, lawyers and dozens of neighbors to question site plans submitted under the city’s newer outdoor-dining rules. Neighbors repeatedly flagged persistent obstructions, seating placed too close to residential building entrances and unclear measurement standards used by DOT, while applicants said temporary pandemic-era layouts and enforcement gaps have created confusion.
Why this matters
The working group’s opinions are advisory to DOT; nevertheless the group’s feedback matters because it documents neighborhood concerns, flags safety and ADA issues for DOT and FDNY reviewers, and can speed or delay applicants’ ability to open outdoor seating. Several applicants said that without clear written guidance from DOT they face added costs and uncertain timelines.
What the meeting covered
Public comments centered on pedestrian clearance, accessibility and enforcement. Pete Davies, a neighborhood commenter, told the committee he was “confused by the site plan” for Lucky Soho and said plans did not appear to show the required 5-foot clearance at adjacent residential doorways. Amanda, the general manager of Lucky Soho, told the committee outdoor dining was “really, really important to us” and said she would supply missing barrier photos and amend drawings.
Several long‑standing neighborhood concerns recurred. Kathy Arntzen, representing the Central Village Block Association, opposed a Bandits sidewalk cafe application, saying the small corner sidewalk “gets very chaotic” and noting the temporary program had led to recurring noise and crowding complaints. David Rosenberg and Susan Ginsberg, both residents, described repeated, on‑the‑ground violations at several locations and urged stronger enforcement.
Applicants described the practical challenges of meeting multiple agencies’ requirements. Rakesh Shandy Ramani, owner/operator of Vastia by Wine Bar (West Village), said he had removed tables that conflicted with residential entrances and that DOT was reviewing…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

