Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Administrative Procedure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board debates waiving 45‑day notice for stipulations on unscheduled appeals

3570750 · May 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members and staff discussed whether the Yolo County Assessment Appeals Board should accept stipulations for appeals not yet scheduled and whether applicants can waive the 45‑day notice requirement to allow earlier disposition; no policy change was adopted and staff were asked to refine language and consider closed-session follow-up.

Yolo County Assessment Appeals Board members discussed procedures for approving stipulations in cases that have not yet been scheduled for hearing and whether applicants may waive the statutory 45‑day notice period to permit earlier resolution.

Assessor's Office staff said they have been working with taxpayers and sometimes can reach agreement on value for prior tax-year appeals before those appeals are scheduled. Staff asked whether the board prefers to see stipulations only after an appeal is scheduled or whether the parties may submit a stipulation for board approval even if the hearing has not been placed on a calendar.

Board members and staff discussed key practical points: the board has no meeting in June and the next available meeting is in July; staff can send the 45‑day notice to align with a July hearing; applicants may be asked to waive the 45‑day notice; and, if an applicant waives the notice, the stipulation should explicitly record that the applicant was advised of the notice and knowingly waived it. Members raised concern about potential consequences if a party later objects that they were not given notice; one board member suggested adding clarifying language to the stipulation addressing waiver and consequences for nonappearance.

No formal action was taken. The board discussed bringing the matter back for further consideration and staff indicated they could draft stipulation language that records an applicant's waiver and clarifies the consequence of nonappearance. One board member asked to take the issue up in closed session after staff develop proposed language.

Why it matters: Allowing stipulations before scheduling and accepting a waiver of the 45‑day notice could reduce duplicate hearings and speed resolution for taxpayers and staff, but it raises notice and due-process concerns that the board said should be clearly documented in any stipulation procedure.