Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission defers decision on St. James Episcopal monument sign; asks for lower‑light display options
Summary
CAR approved the masonry monument sign design but deferred a decision on the proposed internally illuminated digital message board, requesting examples of lower‑lumen or reflective display technologies, information on message change frequency, and zoning/permit constraints.
Richmond — The Commission of Architectural Review deferred a decision about a proposed digital message board at St. James Episcopal Church after members expressed concern about internally illuminated electronic signage in a Monument Avenue historic context.
What was proposed
Applicants sought CAR approval for a new brick and cast‑concrete monument sign integrated with a recently approved retaining wall and ramp. The proposed sign included a central digital message board intended to allow the church to update event information.
Why the commission deferred
Staff recommended approving the masonry sign but denying any internally illuminated digital message board, citing CAR guidelines that generally prohibit internal illumination in City Old and Historic Districts. Commissioners asked the applicant to provide:
- Examples of non‑internally illuminated display systems that provide poster‑like appearance (e‑ink or reflective low‑lumen displays were discussed), - Documentation of brightness (measured light levels) and proposed limits on message frequency or animation, and - Clarification about what portions of the sign are visible from public rights of way and any zoning sign‑permit constraints.
Public comment and applicant position
The church’s representatives said the intent was to increase accessibility and timely community messaging for events such as weekly dinners and campus outreach. Neighbors and representatives of the nearby West Avenue Improvement Association said they were concerned about the precedent and visual impact of a glowing LED display in a highly pedestrian area; several commissioners and public commenters requested mock‑ups or a dusk demonstration to judge visual impact.
Next steps
The commission deferred action and asked the applicant to return with examples of low‑lumen or non‑internally illuminated message displays (or mock‑ups), data on light levels and frequency of changes, and any relevant zoning conditions. Staff will work with the church to coordinate follow‑up and administrative review where possible.
— Sources: CAR meeting transcript and staff presentation.
