Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners cite Oregon State Sheriffs Association guidance in ongoing dispute with county sheriff
Summary
A presentation and Q&A with the Oregon State Sheriffs Association (OSSA) executive director underlined commissioners' legal interpretation that county commissioners must be involved in contracts and oversight of sheriff budgets; commissioners said the association's answers align with a county declaratory-judgment action.
Members of the Curry County Board of Commissioners discussed a question-and-answer session with Tim Svensson, executive director of the Oregon State Sheriffs Association (OSSA), that a commissioner attended at Association of Oregon Counties’ County College. The attending commissioner recounted that Svensson said relationships between commissioners and sheriffs are primary and that contracts that bind the county should be reviewed by county counsel and the board.
Svensson, the board reported, told attendees that while sheriffs oversee law enforcement priorities, the county controls the dollars and that contracts that bind the county should normally be signed in partnership with the board. “Relationships are primary. Everything else is secondary,” Svensson said, according to the commissioner’s recitation of the recorded Q&A.
The session touched on statutory authority and case law. Commissioners and their counsel discussed ORS provisions that govern county contracts and sheriff duties, and referenced prior case law on the budget-setting role of commissioners. A county official summarized that the county’s pending declaratory-judgment filing asks a court to clarify whether the sheriff must obtain board approval to enter contracts that bind county funds and whether the sheriff must attend county meetings upon request. The board characterized the declaratory-judgment action as seeking a judicial statement of the legal duties already set out in ORS and prior appellate decisions.
Commissioners said they welcomed Svensson’s candor and that OSSA’s presented guidance aligns with the board’s position. Several commissioners described the dispute as damaging to local governance and urged a reset. One commissioner urged forming a three-way meeting of the sheriff’s office, the board and OSSA to identify where communications broke down and to restore routine cooperation.
No new ordinance or formal change to staffing was adopted at the meeting. Commissioners said the declaratory-judgment case could set precedent for how counties and sheriffs coordinate across Oregon and stressed the need for improved communication and for county-commissioner oversight of how county money is spent.
A county attorney or court decision will be required to resolve questions that commissioners said the disputing parties have been unable to settle internally.
