Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Broadband Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council committee forwards Lumos Fiber citywide build proposal to council after extensive Q&A on construction, service and public impacts

3409778 · May 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representatives of Lumos Fiber described a proposed citywide fiber build to Amherst council members and answered questions about underground vs. aerial construction, resident outreach, restoration, pedestals, utility strikes and scheduling. The committee voted to send ordinance 25‑20 to the full council.

Representatives of Lumos Fiber presented a proposal May 19 to build a citywide fiber‑optic network in Amherst and the City committee voted to forward ordinance 25‑20 to the full council after questions about construction methods, resident outreach and protections.

Steve Christen, who identified himself as a Lumos representative, described fiber as “particles of light” with a long expected lifespan and said Lumos is self‑funded and not seeking city or federal grants. “When I put fiber into the ground…typically it's a 20 to 30 year lifespan,” Christen said, and added that upgrades are made by changing electronics on each end rather than re‑digging fiber.

George Kemp, Lumos director of construction relations, described the company’s construction and resident‑support practices, including advance notice, door hangers, “street sheets” that list streets under construction and a U.S.‑based customer line the company supplies to crews and residents. Kemp said the company commits to a three‑day restoration standard after excavation and offers a 24‑hour response requirement for resident complaints. “Buck stops with me,” Kemp said, offering a corporate contact for municipal follow‑up.

Councilmembers asked whether the build would be mainly underground (Christen said roughly 80% underground, 20% aerial as a typical build) and about the visual impact of equipment. Kemp said most residential connections use ground‑level pedestals or flush vaults—“flower pots” that sit flush with the lawn—and that above‑ground cabinets would be reserved for commercial or non‑residential locations when necessary.

Mayor and staff described the city’s concerns based on prior builds: pole attachments, right‑of‑way coordination, franchise fees that no longer apply to some internet providers, bonding and the need for clear restoration and inspection language in agreements. The mayor said prior installs sometimes left yards unrestored and that the city intends to use right‑of‑way and pole‑attachment agreements and bonding protections where needed.

Lumos said it would work with the city to identify routes, coordinate schedules (to avoid duplicative street work), and provide weekly or daily street sheets and other communications. Steve Christen said Lumos aims to light a neighborhood and begin selling services 45 to 60 days after construction in a neighborhood is complete.

Councilmember Gaminski moved to send ordinance 25‑20 (the pole‑attachment and right‑of‑way use agreement requested by Lumos) to the council floor; Councilmember Watkins seconded and the committee voted to forward the item. The committee did not adopt changes to the draft agreement at the meeting; staff indicated the city engineer had received a draft and the parties would continue to refine permit and agreement language before readings.