Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health And Social Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves 30‑bed recuperative care facility in transit‑oriented neighborhood
Summary
The planning commission unanimously approved Conditional Use Permit 25‑003 to allow a 30‑bed recuperative care facility at 44748 and 44758 Elm Avenue in a transit‑oriented neighborhood; staff found the project categorically exempt under CEQA.
Get email alerts on the Health And Social Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lancaster City Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve Conditional Use Permit 25‑003, allowing a recuperative care facility to operate in two existing buildings at 44748 and 44758 Elm Avenue.
Senior planner Claire Bridal (presenting staff for this item) summarized the application: the proposal recreates an earlier approved recuperative-care use at the site, would provide up to 30 beds for people discharged from hospitals who need short-term recovery services, and includes on-site parking accessible from Elm Avenue and the rear alley. Bridal told commissioners the current application substantially matches a 2018 approval that later expired after approved time extensions.
The applicant submitted a letter concurring with staff recommendations and conditions. David Delaplane, representing the applicant, said the project team expects to be "weeks away" from readiness and confirmed the applicant accepts the conditions in resolution 25‑07.
Commissioner Moore moved to adopt resolution 25‑07 approving CUP 25‑003; the motion was seconded and passed 6‑0 with one commissioner absent. Staff characterized the project as categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act and authorized staff to file a notice of exemption and implement conditions attached to the CUP.
The facility is in the transit‑oriented development neighborhood medium (TOD‑N‑M) zone; staff noted the proposal reuses existing buildings and includes parking and courtyard access. No public speakers opposed the project at the hearing.
