Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Broadland Creek neighbors ask commission to pause new subdivision over grading and storm-drain fears
Summary
Residents of the Broadland Creek area told the Huron City Commission they were blindsided by grading and tree removal linked to a 13-lot subdivision and asked the city to halt work until engineering and drainage questions are answered; the commission scheduled a work session for June 2.
Residents of Broadland Creek urged the Huron City Commission on May 19 to pause construction of a 13-lot subdivision after grading and tree removal changed yard elevations and raised storm‑drain and runoff concerns.
At Tuesday’s public forum, several residents described sudden changes to topography that left new lots perched above existing backyards and said they were not told the final grading plans before work began. “The bulldozer showed up and the tree strip went out,” said Steve Sharon, who gave his address as Broadland Creek Court. “People’s backyards have dirt this high, straight up and down.”
Residents said the changes include a raised cul‑de‑sac they described as 5 to 6 feet higher than existing yards and an inlet placed near property lines. Chad Wild said he was “blindsided” and asked whether the city or the developer is responsible if the inlet clogs and floods basements. Linda Peterson said the berm between the new development and existing houses appears to be about 6 feet and that neighbors would like trees planted to screen and stabilize the slope.
City Planner Barry Cranston told the commission the project had been considered earlier by the planning commission, and several residents said they had attended that meeting and believed covenants and other conditions would be the same as surrounding lots. Neighbors said the actual earthwork exceeded what they had expected and that key details about final grades and storm infrastructure were not shared with adjacent homeowners.
Mayor Robich and the commission heard repeated requests for the city to intercede. The mayor said no formal action would be taken at the meeting but that the commission would place the matter on a work session agenda for further discussion; commissioners set a tentative work session for June 2.
The commission clarified that public‑forum remarks do not constitute action by the body at that meeting. Commissioners and staff said they will review engineering and drainage information at the work session and invite stakeholders, including the developer and the city engineer, to provide more detailed plans and answers to residents’ questions.
Residents said their principal questions include: the final grading heights adjacent to existing yards, whether the storm‑drain inlet and pipe sizing are adequate for peak runoff, who is responsible for maintenance if an inlet clogs, and what erosion‑control measures will be used while construction continues. Neighbors asked that the city address those items before additional grading proceeds.
The commission did not adopt a moratorium or stop‑work order that evening; instead, it scheduled the June 2 work session to review the technical materials and hear recommendations from staff and the developer. The city advised residents to attend that session and said staff would post meeting details when available.
