Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning Open Space topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses potential rezoning of 4.7-acre parcel in open-space zone; floodplain and easements limit subdivision options
Summary
Planning staff and commissioners reviewed a request about converting a 4.7-acre open-space parcel (parcel AD-0714-000-000) to residential use and discussed irrigation easements, floodplain designations and septic capacity limits.
Commissioners and staff reviewed a request from Talia Martinez about a roughly 4.7-acre parcel currently zoned open space (parcel AD-0714-000-000) and discussed whether it could be rezoned or split into residential lots.
Staff explained that the parcel contains multiple irrigation easements (north line, south line, and the high water ditch) and that a portion of the parcel lies adjacent to the falls and existing Falls Park Lodge. Commissioners raised geologic hazards and floodplain designations that apply to parts of the parcel. Staff reported that, as of the meeting, the land remained in the floodplain and that the site layout includes a “pinch point” for access between the falls parking lot and Stoney’s Place.
Commissioners and the applicant discussed septic constraints raised by county staff: the transcript records that Iron County indicated a limitation of two septic tanks per 20 acres in the broader area, which could constrain subdivision plans. Staff said the county and the Southwest Health Department ultimately control septic approvals and stormwater/drainage review; the health department must review plans for any RV- or campsite-style septic layouts.
Commissioners agreed the site presents constraints that make large-scale residential subdivision unlikely without engineering work and coordination with county agencies. Staff said some housing adjustments might be possible, but multiple irrigation easements, floodplain mapping and septic limits mean a careful, site-specific review would be required before any rezoning or subdivision could move forward. No formal motion or vote was recorded on rezoning during the meeting.
