Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Dane County committee weighs priorities for opioid-settlement dollars, debates balance between harm reduction and other services

4783765 · June 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dane County’s Health & Human Needs Committee opioid settlement subcommittee met June 9 to review possible approaches for spending incoming opioid-settlement dollars and to set a process for making formal recommendations to the county’s Health & Human Needs (HHN) committee ahead of the 2026 budget cycle.

Dane County’s Health & Human Needs Committee opioid settlement subcommittee met June 9 to review possible approaches for spending incoming opioid-settlement dollars and to set a process for making formal recommendations to the county’s Health & Human Needs (HHN) committee ahead of the 2026 budget cycle.

The subcommittee’s discussion centered on a staff analysis showing most current settlement funding is directed to harm-reduction activities and on the proposed Harm Reduction Center and drop-in services. Todd Campbell, Division Administrator, presented budget alignment information and said, “we have 83% of our funding allocated to the harm reduction area. . . If we continue with the current spending plan as it is in 2026, that percentage for harm reduction increases to 93%.” He and other members clarified that the 93% projection assumes full staffing and full utilization of the planned drop-in center.

Why it matters: the settlement documents (referred to repeatedly as “Schedule E” or “Exhibit E”) specify categories where municipalities may spend opioid-settlement funds — treatment, prevention, harm reduction, recovery support and remediation — but do not mandate percentages. Committee members debated whether the county’s current distribution, which they said heavily favors harm reduction, matches community needs and the settlement’s intent.

Discussion highlights - Harm reduction vs. other strategies: Several members —…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans