Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Preparedness topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs fixed vs. portable generator for city building; asks staff to get specific quotes
Summary
Councilors discussed purchasing a hard‑wired generator for the city building versus using a portable unit, considering fuel storage, maintenance, and testing; they instructed staff to gather a specific quote from the contractor that services the sewer plant and return recommendations.
Council members discussed options for emergency power at the city building, weighing the tradeoffs between a permanently installed, hard‑wired generator (natural gas or propane with on-site fuel storage) and a portable unit that could be brought on site as needed.
Council members noted advantages for a permanently installed generator: automatic testing cycles, immediate availability during an emergency, and reduced need to retrieve and transport a portable unit from storage. Concerns included fuel storage, fencing/security for the unit, and ongoing maintenance. A portable generator would avoid on-site fuel storage but would require safe storage, logistical retrieval during an emergency and a transfer switch for safe connection.
A cost estimate discussed informally during the meeting put a ballpark at roughly $15,000 for an installed system including electrical work and labor; participants said exact pricing varied by model and fuel type. Council directed staff to obtain a recommendation and quote from the vendor that maintains the sewer plant generator (Cummins was mentioned in discussion) so the town could compare options and vendor service plans.
Councilors also discussed dual‑fuel or multi‑fuel units, propane versus natural gas, security fencing and annual maintenance agreements. The council asked staff to forward existing quotes and to request a supplier recommendation and a firm quote for hard‑wired installation and service so they could make a procurement decision.
