Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Equipment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves purchase of two type-1 fire engines; city to finance within replacement fund
Summary
The council authorized purchase of two Pierce Type-1 fire engines to replace 2005 apparatus; staff said buying the city's standard spec will reduce logistical differences and fit existing fleet equipment layouts. The engines are financed within the city's vehicle replacement program without additional appropriation.
Vacaville City Council on June 10 approved purchasing two Pierce Type-1 fire engines to replace two engines that entered service in 2005.
Fire Chief Chris Conception told the council the decision follows a fleet study and previous council direction to replace aging apparatus. Staff initially evaluated a "Build My Pierce" (BMP) option with a shorter initial lead time and lower per-unit price, but after testing dealer modifications and comparing total cost and schedule, the department pivoted back to the city's standard velocity Type-1 spec to preserve equipment layout consistency and firefighter familiarity.
Details and financing - Vendor/spec: Pierce Type-1 engines built to the city's standard specification. - Quoted combined contract cost: approximately $2.4 million for the two engines (total contract cost reported to council). - Build time quoted: approximately 48'to'51 months, though staff said some vendors have recently decreased build times. - Financing: the engines will be financed within the city's vehicle replacement/ongoing capital program; the finance director told council the financing fits within the annual replacement allocation (reported as roughly $700,000) and no additional appropriation was required.
Why staff chose the standard spec Chief Conception said the standard spec preserves consistent equipment placement across the fleet (hoses, tools, compartments and pump controls), which eases firefighter operations and training. The BMP option would have required dealer'level modifications that lengthened the build time and reduced the total price advantage.
Council action Council approved the resolution authorizing the purchase and financing; council discussion focused on fleet timing, pump and tank capacity differences and options for offsetting financing costs. Staff said current investments earn market yields on some short-term instruments and continue to manage financing costs within the replacement program.
Ending Staff will execute contract documents and track build progress; council asked staff to report back on delivery timing and any material changes to cost or schedule.
