Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historical Resources topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Revere budgets small utility reimbursement for historic building; volunteers limit public access

3795943 · June 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Ways and Means Subcommittee recorded a brief presentation that FY2026 includes a line for reimbursing utility expenditures at the historic building; councilors noted the building is staffed by volunteers and cited lack of volunteers as the reason it remains largely closed despite prior one-time funding.

The Revere historical and cultural resources budget received a brief review on June 10, with staff telling the Ways and Means Subcommittee the city's FY2026 budget includes a small line item to reimburse utility expenses for the historic society’s building.

A budget staff member said the appropriation is intended to cover utilities and is typically transferred as a one-time reimbursement at the end of the year: “That's just a line item for reimbursement of expenditures for utilities at the historic building. So, we don't spend from it. We usually just transfer the 1 time at the end of the year.”

Councilors asked whether the city could pursue grants to fund part-time staffing for the building. Councilor McKenna noted she had allocated $50,000 in her district improvement funds to help open the building but said volunteers remain scarce and the building cannot operate without them: “I gave them, dollars 50,000 in my CIT money to open it, but they can't open it because they don't have any volunteers to to they have 1 volunteer.”

Officials said the city will continue to provide utility reimbursements but deferred larger questions about the building’s future to the mayor’s office and noted the city recently reorganized grant administration; staff recommended directing potential grant opportunities to the city’s grant writer.

No formal vote was taken; councilors expressed support for the building and encouraged volunteer recruitment and possible grant pursuits.