Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves rezoning of 400 Chestnut Street from R‑3 to B‑1 and grants variance to formalize long-standing commercial use
Summary
Planning commissioners recommended approval of a zone change and a variance for 400 Chestnut Street, ending decades of nonconforming commercial uses at the site. Staff recommended approval of the development plan and variance; the commission voted unanimously to recommend both.
Planning commissioners unanimously recommended rezoning 400 Chestnut Street from R‑3 (planned neighborhood residential) to B‑1 (neighborhood business) and approved a variance that will formalize the property’s long-standing commercial uses.
Planner James Mills said the property has a long history of commercial uses despite its R‑3 zoning: "the property was before the board of adjustment in 1932 to build the structure that's currently on‑site... Since then, the property has changed uses a multitude of times ... it has been commercial throughout its entire history." Staff reviewed the development plan and recommended approval, noting the applicant is not proposing structural changes and that the variance sought — a reduced zone‑to‑zone buffer — would not negatively impact surrounding properties.
Applicant representative Kyle Hogue of Mizzou Engineering told the commission the owner wants the property rezoned so future owners would not need repeated conditional‑use approvals. “We’re just more formalizing what's been happening with the property for a long time,” Hogue said, adding that the owner has informally canvassed neighbors and reported little pushback; the applicant agreed to work with staff on any reasonable conditional restrictions the commission or council might pursue.
Commissioner Wilson moved for approval of the zone change with the understanding staff would draft conditional restrictions if the commission wished to narrow permitted uses; the motion passed unanimously. The commission also recommended approval of the variance, with commissioners noting the long history of commercial use and staff’s assessment that the requested deviation from the buffer standard would not harm adjacent properties.
What comes next: the commission’s recommendation advances to the Planning Commission/Urban County Council for final action. Staff and the applicant said they would continue outreach with nearby property owners and can consider conditional restrictions — such as prohibiting certain uses — if requested by the council or neighborhood groups.
