Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Multifamily Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developer seeks to consolidate zoning and adopt concept plan for 343‑unit multifamily project off Sarah Jane Parkway

3730919 · June 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff recommended approval of a FLUM amendment and planned development rezoning to consolidate split zoning on about 31 acres and adopt a concept plan for a proposed 343‑unit multifamily development with attached garages and a maximum building height of 65 feet.

Planning staff presented two related items: a future land use map amendment and a rezoning/concept plan for a roughly 31‑acre site with primary access at Sarah Jane Parkway. The comprehensive plan amendment would change remaining open‑space/drainage and low‑density portions of the site to high‑density residential. The rezoning request would consolidate split zoning into a single planned development for multifamily use so the project can be reviewed under one district.

Staff described a concept plan showing 14 buildings with about 343 dwelling units, a clubhouse, pool and dog park. The proposal bases zoning on multifamily‑2 standards with two modifications: a requested maximum building height of 65 feet and parking garages provided for roughly 60% of units, which staff noted is above what Appendix W typically requires. Staff reported most of the site already had a FLUM designation of high‑density residential; the amendment covers the remainder of the site and staff recommended approval.

Commissioners asked whether the garages were attached; staff confirmed they are attached. A commissioner expressed concern about drainage and floodplain; staff explained drainage and detention would be reviewed during the civil/site plan stage and showed roughly 3 acres of the site designated for detention/utility easements. Staff emphasized the floodplain area would not be developed. No formal action was taken during the briefing; the items will go to the public hearing.