Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Docket Continuance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council amends and continues several ordinances; multiple items set for June, July and September meetings
Summary
The clerk reviewed the consent agenda and recommended amendments and continuances for numerous ordinances and one resolution; several items were continued to June 23, others to July 28 and one to Sept. 22, while multiple items received planning commission approval and remain on the docket for future action.
Madam Clerk reviewed the consent agenda and the council recorded multiple amendments and continuances for ordinances and one resolution on the consent and regular agendas.
The continuity of these items matters because continuances change public hearing schedules and delay final decisions on zoning and other land-use items that require Planning Commission and council action.
During the docket review the clerk said several listed ordinances would be amended later in the meeting and continued to future council dates: some items were scheduled for the June 23 council meeting, several for the July 28 meeting, and one was continued to Sept. 22. The clerk identified specific ordinance numbers and planning commission recommendations as read into the record.
Key items read into the record included: Item 1 ("ordinance 20 20 five-twenty 5") to be amended and continued to the July 28 meeting; Item 2 ("ordinance 20 20 five-forty 6") to be amended and continued to the June 23 meeting; Item 3 ("ordinance 20 25 0 52") continued to the Sept. 22 meeting per Planning Commission; Item 4 ("ordinance 20 25 0 79") to be continued to June 23; Item 5 ("ordinance 20 25 0 80") was noted as continued from May 12 and was to be continued to June 23; Item 6 ("ordinance 20 25 0 81") continued to June 23; Item 7 ("ordinance 20 25 1 12") was listed with Planning Commission recommended approval; Item 8 ("ordinance 20 25 1 13") continued to June 23; Items 9'14 ("ordinance 20 25 1 14, 1 15, 1 16, 1 17, 1 18, and 1 19") were listed with Planning Commission recommended approval; Item 15 ("ordinance 20 25 1 20") was noted as continued by Planning Commission and to be continued to June (date not fully specified in the record); Item 16 ("resolution 20 25 r 20") was continued to July because the June organization development standing committee meeting was cancelled; on the regular agenda Item 17 ("20 24 1 87") was continued to July 28; and Item 18 ("resolution 20 24 r 041") was discussed and Councilmember Robertson asked that it be continued to the June 23 meeting.
Councilmember Robertson said she had not yet conferred with the paper's lead patron, Miss Lynch, and requested more time to review proposed amendments; Robertson said she is not opposed to the paper but preferred additional factual work before amendments are finalized.
The clerk confirmed that the docket concluded and the council moved on to the next agenda item.
No final votes on the substantive content of the listed ordinances were taken at this docket review; the actions noted were continuances and referrals to later council meetings as listed above.
