Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Police Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters press council on police oversight, old school administration funds and farming access
Summary
Speakers urged council to investigate perceived inequities in boards and commissions, asked for an oversight commission for the police department, and urged the council to consider redirecting $6 million linked to the old school administration building toward fire department needs or other immediate priorities.
Three members of the public used the citizens’ comment period to press council on governance, police oversight and city capital priorities.
Vic Nichols raised several items: he asked that the lease amount in the farmland lease be rounded to an even number for symbolic appreciation of farmers, sought clarity on proposed fireworks enforcement where fireworks land on a property, and asked whether pending changes to Chesapeake Integrated Behavioral Healthcare (CIBH) would change costs for taxpayers.
Tommy Hart urged the council to examine historic police conduct and requested the city consider appointing an oversight commission for the Chesapeake Police Department. Hart recounted previously raised concerns about past investigations and evidence handling; the mayor and staff noted the public speaker said the events occurred many years earlier and suggested returning with a specific request for action.
Markela Moore — identifying herself as a Washington Borough resident — asked council to reconsider whether the $6 million that had been proposed (and later pulled from the agenda) for the old school administration building could instead be allocated to meet urgent fire department needs. She said she expected a revenue-sharing true-up process would make the funds more constrained after the fiscal year close and urged council to consider reallocating funds for immediate public-safety needs.
Responses and staff follow-up City Manager Price explained the "true up" process for the year-end revenue-sharing calculation and said counsel directs final use of excess funds. He told Moore that the item pulled from the agenda was intended to clarify ownership and accounting before any appropriation; staff confirmed city land records show the land is owned by the city and the buildings appear in the city’s inventory but are listed as assets on the school board inventory, so staff pulled the item to clear title/lien questions before recommendations.
Ending: Speakers asked for clearer oversight and accounting; councilmembers and staff committed to follow-up on ownership and accounting for the old school administration property and to provide the requested asset-forfeiture accounting noted elsewhere on the agenda.
