Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Military Equipment Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public meeting held on Crescent City military equipment use policy; chief answers questions about weapons and drones
Summary
Council held a required public meeting on the city’s military equipment use policy. The police chief described the department’s existing equipment, clarified planned purchases and answered community questions; no ordinance vote was taken at the meeting.
Crescent City held a public meeting required under state law for the city’s military equipment use policy, and residents asked questions about the department’s weapons, less‑lethal tools and potential drone use.
Staff said the public meeting was the statutory opportunity for residents to ask questions and provide comment; the ordinance and annual report on military equipment had been introduced at a prior meeting. The Police Chief and staff answered questions from the public.
In response to questions about the department’s inventory, the Police Chief said the department currently stores four Colt AR‑15 rifles that are not in active use and said the department has six Daniel Defense MK‑18 rifles (also AR‑type rifles). The chief said the department intends to purchase three additional MK‑18 rifles this year; he also said the department was "still looking to purchase the drone, but we haven't purchased one of those." The chief described additional items covered by the policy as standard ammunition for the rifles (5.56/2.23), pepper‑ball launchers and rounds, less‑lethal Remington shotguns and 40‑millimeter direct‑impact OC and CS gas rounds.
“It's the same report as the last three years,” the Police Chief said, noting the list reflects equipment the department has carried for years and is required to report under state rules. The chief repeatedly emphasized the department does not have surplus military vehicles or tactical vehicles such as MRAPs.
Members of the public urged the council to adopt local policies governing drone use and to ensure the department follows Fourth Amendment and privacy protections. One resident asked that drone and other policies be designed to minimize the risk of later judicial reversal; another suggested written rules be available to the public. The chief acknowledged those concerns and said the department posts its full policy online and that transparency is a priority.
No ordinance vote was held during the public meeting portion; staff said the meeting was a required step in the ordinance process and that the public could ask questions before the council took final action at a later date.
