Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Broadband And Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discuss Starlink access, county P‑card limits and potential state broadband/water funding
Summary
Woods County officials discussed limited internet options at a county shed, the obstacles to purchasing Starlink (which requires a credit card), county purchasing‑card (P‑card) training requirements, and a potential state broadband/water funding opportunity that could bring roughly $1.7 million to local projects.
Woods County meeting participants discussed options to provide reliable internet service at a county shed and broader infrastructure funding opportunities, including a possible state broadband/water funding round.
One participant said the county’s current provider (Pioneer) does not provide sufficient bandwidth at the shed and that the only available alternative is Starlink, which — according to the discussion — requires a credit card to order. The participant asked whether the county could obtain the service and be reimbursed later or whether the county could pay directly. The transcript shows a back‑and‑forth about the county purchasing‑card (P‑card) process and required bank training (Bank of Oklahoma) for staff before they may use the card.
A county participant said they were willing to pay the monthly Starlink fee (quoted in the discussion at about $120 per month) and seek reimbursement, but others noted the procurement rules and the P‑card requirement complicate immediate purchase because Starlink’s ordering process requires prepayment by credit card.
In the same discussion, speakers referenced a state funding opportunity that could allocate about $1,700,000 and noted that funds might be eligible for broadband or water infrastructure projects. Participants weighed priorities, with repeated comments that water infrastructure is critical; one speaker said water lines and repairs might be a better use of available funds than a parking lot or other one‑time projects. The meeting included suggestions such as using transportable containers as storage rather than building new facilities, and that broadband should be considered but water needs are more urgent.
No formal motion or vote to buy internet service, apply for the state funding, or reallocate county funds appears in the transcript excerpt. The discussion was framed as an exploration of options and constraints rather than a request for immediate county action.
