Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Assembly approves guardrails for commercial autonomous delivery vehicles, requires human safety operator and reporting

3632279 · May 29, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers passed AB 33, which requires a qualified human safety operator aboard commercial autonomous delivery vehicles while they operate on neighborhood streets and sets reporting and a legislative review trigger.

The Assembly passed AB 33 on May 14 by a 52–6 roll-call vote, adopting a bill that requires a qualified human safety operator to be present in commercial autonomous delivery vehicles during operations on local streets and establishes data collection and a legislative review trigger.

Why it matters: The bill aims to preserve a human safety layer while the state and companies gather real-world safety data for new uses of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology in last-mile delivery. Supporters cited incidents in San Francisco — including AVs obstructing emergency responses and at least one pedestrian injury — to argue for cautious deployment in neighborhoods. Opponents argued the bill could slow technology adoption that might ultimately save lives.

What the bill does: AB 33 requires a human safety operator in delivery AVs, mandates collection and reporting of safety data to state authorities, and creates a legislative review trigger so the Legislature can reassess the requirement once a body of data exists. The author framed the requirement as a temporary safety step with a legislatively mandated review to balance innovation and public safety.

Floor debate: Supporters including the author and coauthors emphasized worker and public-safety concerns and said the bill provides a transparent path for legislative oversight. Opponents argued that automation can reduce traffic fatalities caused by human drivers and that the bill would chill innovation; one member urged a sunset rather than open-ended restrictions. The author said the bill does not ban AVs and includes a reporting trigger for later review.

Formal action: The clerk recorded a roll-call vote: Ayes 52, No 6. The measure passed and will require coordination between the Department of Motor Vehicles and legislative committees for the mandated reporting and review timeline.

Next steps: Agencies named in the bill must collect and analyze data and report back to the Legislature as required; the Legislature will revisit the human-operator requirement when the data trigger is met.